The Concept of Educational Protectionism: Prospects and Risks of Adoption in the Context of the Destruction of Trade Relations in the 21st Century

Among the fundamental problems of both economic policy and economic theory, remains the question of the choice between protecting the principle of free trade and protecting domestic production through protectionist measures. Friedrich List’s alternative (both for classical liberalism and mercantilism) concept of educational protectionism made a major contribution to economic theory. Within the framework of this article, it is proposed to consider the possibility of implementing List’s main ideas (prospects of universal association, problems of permanent restrictive measures, difficulties of regulation in the agricultural sector) in the socio-economic realities of the 20th and 21st centuries. It was shown that in the 20th century the dispute between classical liberals and mercantilists was in some way repeated in the form of the dispute between the liberal “end of history” theory (F. Fukuyama) and the peripheral capitalism theory (R. Prebisch, I. Wallerstein). It can be concluded that at the present time hopes for the possibility of overcoming protectionist barriers within the WTO have not been justified; the process of Russia’s accession to this organization was analyzed. The ideas of protectionism have become especially relevant in recent years due to the international trend of expanding trade restrictions, the intensification of trade wars, including with China, and the WTO crisis. The impossibility of resolving conflicts within the WTO is leading to the strengthening of regional trade associations. Thus, the prevailing trends led not only to weakening hopes for the benefits of free trade, but sometimes even to more radical forms of protectionism than was proposed in the F. List concept.

1. List F. Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoi ekonomii [National system of political economy]. Moscow, Sotsium Publ., 2020, 722 p.

2. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii i poslednii chelovek [The end of history and the last man]. Moscow, AST Publ., 2015, 576 p.

3. Popov G. G. National economic development in globalization environment: Friedrich List vs classical school. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, vol.5, no.4, pp.71-85 (in Russian).

4. Kolesnikova T. V. Mekhanizmy realizatsii instrumentov protektsionizma v gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi politike. Dis. dokt. ekon. nauk: 5.2.6. [Mechanisms for implementing protectionism instruments in state economic policy. Dr. econ. sci. dis.: 5.2.6.]. Moscow, 2023, 426 p.

5. Si Tszin’pin nazval protektsionizm prichinoi zamedleniya rosta mirovoi ekonomiki [Xi Jinping called protectionism the reason for the slowdown in global economic growth]. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/7113979 (accessed 11.01.2024).

6. Kadochnikov P. А. Trade liberalization and potectionism in Russia and the world’s leading countries. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik=Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 2015, no.3, pp.3-13 (in Russian).

7. Gilferding R. Finansovyi kapital: Noveishaya faza v razvitii kapitalizma [Financial capital: The newest phase in the development of capitalism]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 1922, 460 p.

8. Shumpeter I. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza: v 3 t. [History of economic analysis: in 3 vol.]. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2004, 1670 p.

9. Portansky A. The imperative of WTO reform in an era of rising protectionism and trade wars. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacij=International Organisations Research Journal, 2019, vol.14, no.2, pp.304-318 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2019-02-12.

10. Loginova A. S. Analiz sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh posledstvii vstupleniya Rossii v VTO: monografiya [Analysis of socio-economic effects of Russia’s WTO accession: мonograph]. St. Petersburg, Troitskii most Publ., 2014, 156 p.

11. Prebish R. Periferiinyi kapitalizm. Est’ li emu al’ternativa [Peripheral capitalism. Is there an alternative to it?]. Moscow, ILA RAN Publ., 1992, 338 p.

12. Tsedilin L. I. The industrial policy according to Friedrich List. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, no.6, pp.102-110 (in Russian).

13. Vallerstain I. Mirosistemnyi analiz: vvedenie [World-system analysis: introduction]. Moscow, Territoriya budushchego Publ., 2006, 248 p.

14. Vallerstain I. Istoricheskii kapitalizm. Kapitalisticheskaya tsivilizatsiya [Historical capitalism. Capitalist civilization]. Moscow, Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdanii KMK Publ., 2008, 176 p.

15. Gloveli G. D., Spaderova A. A. Peripetics of “Tutelary Protectionism”. VTE=Issues of Economic Theory, 2019, no.2, pp.62-81 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2019-10205.

16. Reinert E. Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How Rich Countries Got Rich and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ, 2011, 384 p.

17. Gloveli G. D. Mercantilism, world-system hegemony and protoanalysis of national competitiveness. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2021, no.3(51), pp.163-194 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2021-51-3-8.

18. Stiglitz J. Globalizatsiya: trevozhnye tendentsii [Globalization and its discontents]. Moscow, Natsional’nyi obshchestvenno-nauchnyi fond Publ, 2003, 304 p.

19. Istoriya otnoshenii Rossii i Vsemirnoi torgovoi organizatsii [History of relations between Russia and the World Trade Organization]. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/info/15528799 (accessed 11.01.2024).

20. Zubkov I. SShA lishili VTO vozmozhnosti razbirat’ torgovye spory [The United States deprived the WTO of the ability to resolve trade disputes]. RG. Available at: https://rg.ru/2019/12/10/ssha-lishili-vto-vozmozhnosti-razbirat-torgovye-spory.html (accessed 11.01.2024).

21. Vasilyeva M. Ne tormozit: Meksika prodolzhit avtomobil’noe sotrudnichestvo s RF [Not slowing down: Mexico will continue automotive cooperation with the Russian Federation]. Izvestiya. Available at: https://iz.ru/1033825/mariia-vasileva/ne-tormozit-meksika-prodolzhit-avtomobilnoe-sotrudnichestvo-s-rf (accessed 11.01.2024).

22. Indiya zablokirovala prinyatie soglasheniya po uproshcheniyu protsedur torgovli [India blocked the adoption of an agreement on trade facilitation]. TASS. Available at: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/1342653 (accessed 11.01.2024).

23. Belskaya E. I. Mezhdunarodno-pravovoe regulirovanie zon svobodnoi torgovli i mekhanizmov razresheniya dogovornykh sporov. Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk: 12.00.10 [International legal regulation of free trade zones and mechanisms for resolving contractual disputes. Cand. legal sci. dis.: 12.00.10.]. Moscow, 2018, 180 p.