Assessment of Gender Differences Characteristic of the Main Stages of Entrepreneurial Activity

The article is devoted to the actual problem of the existing differences in the entrepreneurial activity of women and men. The aim of the study is to assess the current levels of participation of women and men in business activities in modern national economies. The study solved the problems of determining the values of indicators that characterize the initial stage of entrepreneurship, stabile entrepreneurship, as well as the exit of entrepreneurs from their businesses. As a starting point, the study used the results of surveys conducted in 59 countries during the implementation of the Global entrepreneurship monitoring project. In the course of the work, the assessment of nine indicators characterizing such stages as start- up and stabile entrepreneurship, as well as the termination of this activity, was considered. The study developed functions that show the distribution of indicators across 59 countries that describe the proportion of women and men in the three main stages of entrepreneurship. In addition, gender differences in these three stages were assessed. The results showed that in most countries there is a gender gap between the indicators of entrepreneurial activity, that is, women participate in it to a lesser extent than men. Comparing the values of indicators for Russia and foreign countries showed that both women and men in our country are less interested in an entrepreneurial career in contrast to other countries. The results obtained are new and original. They have theoretical and practical implications for governments and entrepreneurs. The methodological approach to assessing gender differences in entrepreneurship presented in the article can be used in further research. The new knowledge gained is of interest and can be used in the educational process at universities.

1. Adapting in tough times: The growing resilience of UK SMEs // The Economist. Intelligence Unit. 2013. - 20 р. URL: https://williamwest1980.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/adapting-in-tough-times.pdf (дата обращения: 23.12.2020).

2. Cardon M. S., Stevens С. E., Potter D. R. Misfortunes or mistakes? Cultural sensemaking of entrepreneurial failure // Journal of Business Venturing. 2011. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 79-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.06.004.

3. Carlianne P., Stephens H., Weinstein A. Where are all the self-employed women? Push and pull factors influencing female labor market decisions // Small Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 46. No. 3. P. 365-390. DOI: 10.1007/ s11187-015-9697-2.

4. Cefis E., Marsili O. Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2011. Vol. 21. No. 3. P. 473-498. DOI: 10.1007/s00191-010-0210-4.

5. Chhabra M., Karmarkar Y. Gender gap in entrepreneurship - a study of small and micro enterprises // ZENITH International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 8. P. 82-99.

6. Decker R., Haltiwanger J., Jarmin R., Miranda J. The Role of entrepreneurship in US job creation and economic dynamism // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2014. Vol. 28. No. 3. P. 3-24. DOI: 10.1257/jep.28.3.3.

7. Fairlie R. W., Robb A. M. Gender differences in business performance: Evidence from the characteristics of business owners survey // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33. No. 4. P. 375-395. DOI: 10.1007/s11187- 009-9207-5.

8. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2018/2019 Women's Entrepreneurship Report // Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). - London Business School, London, United Kingdom, 2019. - 108 p.

9. Hockerts K., Wüstenhagen R. Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids - theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing. 2010. Vol. 25. No. 5. P. 481- 492. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005.

10. Korent D., Vukovic K., Brcic R. Entrepreneurial activity and regional development // Ekonomska Istraživanja=Economic Research. 2015. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 939-958. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2015.1084237.

11. Kraemer-Eis H., Lang F., Torfs W., Gvetadze S. European Small Business Finance Outlook // European Investment Fund. 2017. URL: https://www.eif.org/news_centre/publications/eif_wp_43.pdf (дата обращения: 20.12.2020).

12. Lee W., Kim B. Business sustainability of start-ups based on government support: An empirical study of Korean start-ups // Sustainability. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 18. P. 48-51. DOI: 10.3390/su11184851.

13. Markman G. D., Russo M., Lumpkin G. T., Jennings P., Mair J. Entrepreneurship as a platform for pursuing multiple goals: a special issue on sustainability, ethics, and entrepreneurship // Journal of Management Studies. 2016. Vol. 53. No. 5. P. 673-694. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12214.

14. Muñoz P., Cohen B. Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2017. Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 300-322. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2000.

15. Pete S., Nagy A., Matiu D., Gyorfy Z., Benyovszki A., Petru T. Early-stage entrepreneurial aspirations in efficiency- driven economies // Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting. 2011. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 5-18.

16. Pinkovetskaia I., Slepova V. Estimation of fixed capital investment in SMEs: the existing differentiation in the Russian Federation // Business Systems Research. 2018. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 65-78. DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2018-0006.

17. Radas S., Bozic L. The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy // Technovation. 2009. Vol. 29. No. 6-7. P. 438-450. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.12.002.

18. Rotefoss B., Kolvereid L. Aspiring, nascent and fledgling entrepreneurs: An investigation of the business start-up process // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2005. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 109-127. DOI: 10.1080/08985620500074049.

19. Schaltegger S., Wagne M. Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions // Business Strategy and the Environment. 2011. Vol. 20. No. 4. P. 222-237. DOI: 10.1002/bse.682.

20. Simon-Moya V., Revuelto-Taboada L., Ribeiro-Soriano D. Influence of economic crisis on new SME survival: reality or fiction? // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 2016. Vol. 28. No. 1-2. P. 157-176. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2015.1118560.

21. Tomovska Misoska A., Dimitrova M., Mrsik J. Drivers of entrepreneurial intentions among business students in Macedonia // Ekonomska Istraživanja=Economic Research. 2016. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 1062-1074. DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2016.1211956.

22. Ucbasaran D., Shepherd D., Lockett A., Lyon S. Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs // Journal of Management. 2013. Vol. 39. No. 1. P. 163-202. DOI: 10.1177/0149206312457823.

23. Wennberg K., De Tienne D. What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit'? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit // International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. 2014. Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 4-16. DOI: 10.1177/0266242613517126.

24. Zygmunt A. Innovation activities of Polish firms. Multivariate analysis of the moderate innovator countries // Oeconomia Copernicana. 2017. Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 505-521. DOI: 10.24136/oc.v8i4.31.