The Impact of Clusters on the Life Cycles of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in the Regions of Russia

In the context of the global economy and growing competition within the country and on the international market, the development of entrepreneurial ecosystems is an important factor for sustainable economic growth. The author distinguishes between the concepts of “entrepreneurial ecosystem” and “cluster”. In a new view of entrepreneurial ecosystems as dynamic structures that go through the stages of birth, formation, development, maturity, stabilization, renewal or decline, according to the author’s methodology, special attention is paid to the mechanism of prolongation of growth stages due to the influence of clusters. The integration of life cycle theory and clusters provides a new perspective on entrepreneurial ecosystems through the lens of clusters. The novelty lies in the role of clusters as an effective approach that promotes interaction between business, government and science to accelerate innovation processes, create sustainable cooperation networks, attract investment and reduce barriers to entry of new entrants to the market. To substantiate the decision to select the largest entrepreneurial ecosystems, a comparative analysis was carried out for the Novosibirsk Region in the context of the regions of the Siberian Federal District, for the Republic of Tatarstan – in the context of the regions of the Volga Federal District. An analysis of the economic sectors of the studied regions revealed that entrepreneurial companies not only operate in the main ones, but also form related industries. It is revealed that the industry association leads to the creation of new industries of the sixth technological order and the production of competitive goods and services, which creates an additional need for investments for the development of innovation activities by entrepreneurial ecosystem companies. The use of the OTSW analysis tool (according to V.L. Quint’s method) is substantiated. This article will help determine the approach when making a management decision to increase the vital activity of the entrepreneurial ecosystem. The formation of clusters will improve the interaction between ecosystem participants, develop entrepreneurship and stimulate innovation in the country’s regions.

1. Smirnov K., Khabarov V. The Role of Digital Products in the Development of the Domestic Retail Entrepreneurship. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2024, vol.18, no.2, pp.89-103 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-2-89-103.

2. Malecki E.J. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystem. Geography Compass, 2018, vol.12, no.3, article e12359. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12359.

3. Isenberg D. The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. In: Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Babson College, 2011, pp.1-13.

4. Acs Z.J., Lafuente E., Szerb L. Introduction: Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. The Entrepreneurial Ecosystem. A Global Perspective. Ed. by Z. J. Acs, E. Lafuente, L. Szerb. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., 2023, pp.1-28. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-25931-9_1.

5. Zemtsov S.P., Baburin V.L. Entrepreneurial ecosystems in the Russian regions. Regional’nye issledovaniya, 2019, no.2, pp.4-14 (in Russian). DOI: 10.5922/1994-5280-2019-2-1.

6. Trifonova N.V., Proshkina A.S. Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Key features. Izvestiya SPbGEU, 2022, no.5-1(137), pp.86-90 (in Russian).

7. Rubin Yu., Mozhzhukhin D., Alekseeva E. Continuous Entrepreneurship Education: Formation of an Innovative Model (2021 Experience). Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2021, vol.15, no.4, pp.91-108 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2021-15-4-91-108.

8. Sklyuev А., Khabarov V. Role of Organizational and Managerial Innovations in the Development of the Russian Electronics Industry. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2023, vol.17, no.5, pp.101-110 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2023-17-5-101-110.

9. Fadeev А., Khabarov V. Unevenness of Digitalization as a Macroeconomical Source of Imbalance in a Business Environment. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2022, vol.16, no.5, pp.5-18 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-5-5-18.

10. Rubin Yu. Competitive Issues in the Theory of Startups and the Content of Entrepreneurship Education. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2024, vol.18, no.4, pp.45-64 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-4-45-64.

11. Rubin Yu. Management of Participation in Competition as a Direction of Scientific Research. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2024, vol.18, no.1, pp.69-91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-1-69-91.

12. Autio E., Nambisan S., Thomas L.D., Wright M. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, vol.12, no.1, pp.72-95. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1266.

13. De Brito S., Leita~o J. Mapping and defining entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 2021, vol.19, no.1, pp.21-42. DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1751571.

14. Stam E., Spigel B. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. In: The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 2022, pp.407-421. DOI: 10.4135/9781473984080.n21.

15. Wurth B., Stam E., Spigel B. Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2022, vol.46, no.3, pp.729-778. DOI: 10.1177/1042258721998948.

16. Audretsch D., Mason C., Miles M.P., O’Connor A. Time and the dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2021, vol.33, no.1-2, pp.1-14. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2020.1734257.

17. Rastvortseva S.N., Cherepovskaya N.A. Cluster development centers as a form of support for small and medium-sized enterprises in the regions of Russia. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 2023, no.6-7, pp.232-251 (in Russian).

18. Moore J.F. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 1993, vol.71, pp.75-86.