Market power effects after domestic Russian merger and acquisition deals
EDN: UXYXOA
Abstract
This research develops an approach to analysis of market power effects after domestic Russian mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and tests potential success factors for increasing market power after M&A. The sample is based on the Mergermarket database and includes 171 domestic Russian deals closed between January 2006 and September 2015. This paper makes two primary contributions to the literature. First, this paper is related to the recent research that investigates M&A in emerging markets. Our paper is unique in that we study domestic Russian M&A based on long-term firm accounting data. This approach captures private companies and small deals that make up the majority of the Russian M&A market. The second contribution is the evaluation of market power effects after M&A both for the entire Russian M&A market and for the separate industries. The analysis shows that domestic Russian deals do not lead to significant increase in market power. Only 49% of the deals are successful and, on average, they lead to 2,6% increase in EBIT margin. The most successful industry is wholesale and retail where 68% of the deals are successful. This article may be useful for company management to estimate value of prospective M&A deals and for academic researchers interested in analysis of emerging markets M&As.
References
1. Васильев М. Рыночная сила и регулирование цен на рынке электрической мощности // Журнал «Экономическая политика». 2014. № 6. С. 92-102.
2. Депамфилис Д. Слияния, поглощения и другие способы реструктуризации компании // М.: Олимп-Бизнес. 2007. С. 27.
3. Эванс Ф. и Бишоп Д. Оценка компаний при слияниях и поглощениях // М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс. 2004. С. 102-104.
4. Blonigen A., Pierce R. Evidence for the effects of mergers on market power and efficiency. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016, pp. 1- 36. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Justin_ Pierce2/publication/309163412_Evidence_for_the_ Effects_of_Mergers_on_Market_Power_and_Efficiency/ links/5812aeca08ae1f5510c2b46e.pdf.
5. Burghardt D., Helm M. Firm growth in the course of mergers and acquisitions. Small Business Economics, 2015, no. 44 (4), pp. 889-904.
6. Buzzell R., Gale B., Sultan R. Market share - a key to profitability. Harvard Business Review, 1975, no. 53 (1), pp. 97-106.
7. Chatterjee S. Why is synergy so difficult in mergers of related businesses? Strategy & Leadership, 2007, no. 35 (2), pp. 46-52.
8. Damodaran A. The value of synergy. SSRN, 2005. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=841486.
9. Faria A., Wellington W. Validating business simulations: does high market share lead to high profitability? Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 2014, no. 31.
10. Johnston W., Oh J., Peters D. Who's acquiring whom? - Experimental evidence of firm size effect on B2B mergers and marketing/sales tasks. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014, no. 43 (6), pp. 1035-1044.
11. Kirkwood J. Buyer Power and Healthcare Prices. Washington Law Review, 2016, no. 91.
12. OECD. Dynamic efficiencies in merger analysis. Policy roundtables. 2007, pp. 1-295. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/competition/mergers/40623561.pdf.
13. Pothen F. Dynamic Market Power in an Exhaustible Resource Industry. The Case of Rare Earth Elements. SSRN, 2013. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2385991.
14. Reddy K., Yu Y. The relationship between the ownership identity, ownership concentration and firm operating efficiency: Evidence from China 2005- 2012. SSRN, 2014. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2539939.
15. Triiby J. Strategic behavior in international metallurgical coal markets. Energy Economics, 2013, no. 36, pp. 147-157.
16. Wilson, J. Chinese resource security policies and the restructuring of the Asia-Pacific iron ore market. Resources Policy, 2012, no. 37 (3), pp. 331-339.
Review
For citations:
Mikhalchuk V. Market power effects after domestic Russian merger and acquisition deals. Journal of Modern Competition. 2018;12(4-5):18-30. EDN: UXYXOA