“Lobbying of Interests” as a Business Practice

This paper provides a comprehensive study of the concept of lobbying of interests, covering both theoretical aspects and practical application of this term in the Russian judicial system. The study consists of two main stages: a comprehensive review of scientific literature on the topic of lobbying and a detailed analysis of court decisions of various instances of the Russian Federation, in which the term “lobbying” appears. The main goal of the study is to identify and compare interpretations of the concept of “lobbying” in scientific discourse and judicial practice. The authors seek to determine whether there are discrepancies between theoretical concepts and practical application of this term in the legal sphere. The review of scientific literature demonstrates duality in the understanding of lobbying. On the one hand, there is a positive interpretation, characterizing lobbying as an open, legal and informative process. On the other hand, there is a negative interpretation, associating lobbying with shadow, corrupt and illegal practices. The analysis of court decisions revealed a notable trend: in Russian judicial practice, the term “lobbying” is used exclusively in a negative context. This indicates a significant gap between the scientific understanding of lobbying and its perception in the legal system. Of particular interest is the expansion of the concept of lobbying in some court decisions discovered by the authors. In some cases, the term is applied not only to influencing government bodies, but also to attempts to influence decisions of commercial entities. This observation opens up new prospects for studying the evolution of the concept of lobbying as a business practice in the Russian legal field. This study makes a significant contribution to understanding the complexity and versatility of the concept of lobbying, emphasizing the need for further study of the discrepancies between theoretical approaches and the practical application of this concept in the legal sphere. The results of the work can serve as a basis for improving legislation in the field of regulating lobbying activities and increasing the transparency of decision-making processes in both the public and commercial sectors.

1. Tocqueville A. de. Democracy in America. Beinecke Rare Book & Manuscript Library, Yale University, 1835, 560 p.

2. Bentley A. F. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1908, 450 р.

3. Griffith E. The Impasse of Democracy: A Study of the Modern Government in Action. Harrison-Hilton Books, Inc., 1939, 380 р.

4. Truman D. B. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1951, 544 р.

5. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1965, 176 р.

6. Hughes E. C. The Study of Occupations. In: The Sociological Eye: Selected Papers. Vol. 3: Work and Self. Transaction Books, 1971, 286 р.

7. Walker J. L. The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review, 1983, no.77(2), pp.390-406. DOI: 10.2307/1958924.

8. Greenwood J. Representing Interests in the European Union. London, Macmillan, 1997, 292 р.

9. Walker E. T. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, 284 р.

10. Peregudov S. P., Semenenko I. S., Lapina V. I. Gruppy interesov i rossiiskoe gosudarstvo [Interest groups and the Russian state]. Moscow, Editorial URSS Publ., 1999, 218 p.

11. Lyubimov A. P. Istoriya lobbizma v Rossii [History of lobbying in Russia]. Moscow, Fond «Liberal’naya missiya» Publ., 2005, 208 p.

12. Tolstykh P. A. GR. Praktikum po lobbizmu v Rossii [GR. Workshop on lobbying in Russia]. Moscow, Al’pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2007, 1246 p.

13. Dür A., De Bièvre D. The Question of Interest Group Influence. Journal of Public Policy, 2007, vol.27, no.1, pp.1-12. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X07000591.

14. Klüver H. Lobbying in the European Union: Interest Groups, Lobbying Coalitions, and Policy Change. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, 320 р.

15. Naurin D. Deliberation Behind Closed Doors: Transparency and Lobbying in the European Union. ECPR Press, 2007, 184 p.

16. McKay A. Negative Lobbying and Policy Outcomes. American Politics Research, 2012, vol.40, no.1, pp.116-146. DOI: 10.1177/1532673X11413435.

17. Campos N. F., Giovannoni F. Lobbying, Corruption and Political Influence. Public Choice, 2007, no.131(1-2), pp.1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-006-9102-4.

18. LaPira T. M., Thomas H. F. Revolving Door Lobbyists and Interest Representation. Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2014, no.3, pp.4-29. DOI: 10.1057/iga.2013.16.

19. Dal Bó E. Regulatory Capture: A Revie. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2019, vol.22, no.2, pp.203-225. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grj013.

20. Slobozhan I., Ormosi P., Sharma R. Detecting Shadow Lobbying. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2022, no.12, article 48. DOI: 10.1007/s13278-022-00875-y.

21. Recommendation of the Council on Transparency and Integrity in Lobbying and Influence, OECD/LEGAL/0379. OECD, 2024, 12 р.