Deglobalization of the Internet: Myth or Reality?
https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-4-65-82
Abstract
The article shows that, along with technical restrictions on access to internet resources around the world, including due to the use of geo-blocking, new deglobalization factors have emerged associated with the spread of digital platforms and the creation of digital ecosystems. The effect of these factors is based on the exploitation of the bounded rationality of platform users and on the difficulties of solving the problem of collective actions of users, which together create new switching costs and impede the development of competition. The approaches of new institutional economic theory and theory of industrial organization are used as the methodological basis for the study. The main strategies of ecosystem leaders to increase the costs of switching for users and to “lock” them into the ecosystem are described: from strategies less dangerous for competition, such as recommendation systems or bonus programs, to more dangerous ones – in particular, strategies to prevent innovations that would make it easier to multihome or to switch between ecosystems. The article demonstrates how traditional theories of harm developed in antitrust can be used to explain the “sharing” of users between ecosystems, and what effects are unexplained and require further theoretical elaboration. In particular, the applicability of the concepts of input foreclosure and aftermarkets to the analysis of ecosystem behavior strategies is analyzed. New approaches from foreign methodological documents in the field of antitrust related to market analysis and merger assessment are considered as ex ante control measures. It is shown that, despite some progress in practice, a number of questions remain unanswered, including at the theoretical level. The article may be of interest to both regulatory authorities and antitrust experts.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. E. ShastitkoRussian Federation
Andrey E. Shastitko, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chair of Competition and Industrial Policy Department; Director
Moscow
N. S. Pavlova
Russian Federation
Natalia S. Pavlova, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Competition and Industrial Policy Department; Senior Researcher
Moscow
References
1. Avdasheva S. Targets and prospects of the russian competition policy under deglobalization. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2024, vol.18, no.1, pp.6-28 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-1-6-28.
2. Shastitko A. E., Solovyev V. V., Yushkin S. V., Samordina V. I., Pavlova N. S., Meleshkina A. I., Morozov A. N. Podhody k issledovaniyu rynkov roskoshi v celyah primeneniya antimonopol’nogo zakonodatel’stva: monografiya [Approaches to the study of luxury markets for the purposes of applying antimonopoly legislation: monograph]. Мoscow, Faculty of Economics of the Lomonosov State University Publ., 2021, 92 p.
3. Erofeeva E. V., Kotova D. A., Pozdnyakova A. E. The many faces of anti-competitive practices in digital markets. Pravovedenie, 2019, vol.63, no.4, pp.598-624 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21638/spbu25.2019.404.
4. Srnicek N. Kapitalizm platform [Platform capitalism]. Moscow, HSE Publ., 2020, 128 p.
5. Antipina O. N. Platforms as multi-sided markets of the digital age. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya=World Eсonomy and International Relations, 2020, vol.64, no.3, pp.12-19 (in Russian). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-3-12-19.
6. Shastitko A. E., Markova O. A. Approaches to the research of digital transformation effects. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2019, no.3, pp.52-65 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S086904990005085-5.
7. Shastitko A.E., Markova O.A. An old friend is better than two new ones? Approaches to market research in the context of digital transformation for the antitrust laws enforcement. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no.6, pp.37-55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-37-55.
8. Markova O. Airports as platforms: Consequences for antitrust policy. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki=Issues of Economic Theory, 2023, no.3, pp.80-91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2023_3_80_91.
9. Ezrahi A., Stucke M. Virtual’naya konkurentsiya: posuly i opasnosti algoritmicheskoi ekonomiki [Virtual competition. The promise and perils of the algorithm-driven economy]. Moscow, Delo (RANEPA) Publ., 2022, 384 p.
10. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London, Penguin Books, 2009, 312 p.
11. Shastitko A. E., Kurdin A. A. The effects of market power expansion of the essential facility owners in software markets. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2017, no.4(68), pp.43-52 (in Russian).
12. Jacobides M., Lianos I. Ecosystems and competition law in theory and practice. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2021, vol.30, no.5, pp.1199-1229. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtab061.
13. Rovenskaya E. How reverse globalization hinders regulatory power in an era of concentrated digital markets: Discussions. 8th Eurasian Antitrust Forum, 2022. URL: https://iiasa.ac.at/news/oct-2022/how-reverse-globalization-hinders-regulatory-power-in-era-of-concentrated-digital (accessed 12.05.2024).
14. Knyazev D. Skandal vokrug Helldivers 2 na PK: chto proizoshlo i zachem Sony trebovala svyazat’ Steam i PSN [Scandal around Helldivers 2 on PC: what happened and why Sona demanded to link Steam and PSN]. Skillbox Media, 2024. Available at: https://skillbox.ru/media/gamedev/skandal-vokrug-helldivers-2-na-pk-chto-proizoshlo-i-zachem-sony-trebovala-svyazat-steam-i-psn/ (accessed 12.05.2024).
15. Sony otmenila predzakazy Ghost of Tsushima v stranakh bez PSN [Sony canceled pre-orders of Ghost of Tsushima in countries without PSN]. Digital Report, 2024. Available at: https://digital-report.ru/sony-otmenila-predzakazy-ghost-of-tsushima-v-stranah-bez-psn/ (accessed 12.05.2024).
16. Pavlova N., Shastitko A., Kurdin A. The calling card of Russian digital antitrust. Russian Journal of Economics, 2020, vol.6, no.3, pp.258-276. DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.6.53904.
17. U.S. and Plaintiff States v. Apple, Inc. Case 2:24-cv-04055 (D.N.J., March 21, 2024). Available at: https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1344546/dl?inline (accessed 12.05.2024).
18. Lianos I., Carballa-Smichowski B. A coat of many colours – new concepts and metrics of economic power in competition law and economics. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2022, vol.18, no.4, pp.795-831. DOI: 10.1093/joclec/nhac002.
19. Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S., Kashchenko N. V. Antitrust regulation of product ecosystems: The case study of Kaspersky Lab. – Apple Inc. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2020, vol.11, no.4, pp.29-42 (in Russian). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-3.
20. Caffarra C. Furthering ecosystem analysis in antitrust. Promarket, 2023. Available at: https://www.promarket.org/2023/12/14/furthering-ecosystem-analysis-in-antitrust/ (accessed 12.05.2024).
21. Chen Z., Rey P. A theory of conglomerate mergers. TSE Working Paper, 2023, no.1447, pp.1-39. Available at: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2023/wp_tse_1447.pdf (accessed 12.05.2024).
22. Gray J., Santesteban C. How the FTC could have used its draft merger guidelines to argue against Microsoft-Activision and Meta-Within. Promarket, 2023. Available at: https://www.promarket.org/2023/10/16/how-the-ftc-could-have-used-its-draft-merger-guidelines-to-argue-against-microsoft-activision-and-meta-within/ (accessed 12.05.2024).
23. Microsoft / Activision Blizzard merger inquiry. GOV.UK. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/cma-cases/microsoft-slash-activision-blizzard-merger-inquiry (accessed 12.05.2024).
24. Microsoft / Activision Blizzard, In the Matter of. Federal Trade Commission. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/2210077-microsoftactivision-blizzard-matter (accessed 12.05.2024).
25. Amazon / iRobot. M.10920. European Commission. Available at: https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/cases/M.10920 (accessed 12.05.2024).
26. Golovanova S. The essential facilities doctrine in the Russian antimonopoly policy: Reasons and risks of implementation. Ekonomicheskaya politika=Economic policy, 2013, no.3, pp.126-143 (in Russian).
27. Kosyakina A. I., Podlesnaya A. V. Counteraction to monopolistic activity in the field of software on the example of cases against Microsoft. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta. Elektronnyi zhurnal=Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, 2019, vol.10, no.2, pp.29-52 (in Russian). DOI: 10.38050/2078-3809-2018-10-2-29-52.
28. Avdasheva S. B., Yusupova G. F., Korneeva D. V. Competition legislation towards digital platforms: Choice between antitrust and regulation. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsypalnogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2022, no.3, pp.61-86 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-3-61-86.
29. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992). Justia. Available at: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/451/ (accessed 12.05.2024).
30. Shastitko A. E. Competition on aftermarkets: The subject matter and policy applications. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=Journal of the New Economic Association, 2012, no.4, pp.104- 126 (in Russian).
31. Shastitko A. Antitrust law enforcement in aftermarkets: For product boundaries estimates to competition advocacy. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2015, vol.9, no.4, pp.5-29 (in Russian).
32. Shastitko A. Trading in durable goods: A set of objects and limits of antitrust. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2015, vol.9, no.3, pp.32-56 (in Russian).
33. Williamson O. Ekonomicheskie instituty kapitalizma. Firmy, rynki, «otnoshencheskaya» kontraktatsiya [Economic institutions of capitalism. Firms, markets, “relational” contracting]. St. Petersburg, Lenizdat Publ., 1996, 702 p.
34. Avdasheva S. B., Shastitko A. E., Kalmychkova E. N. Economic analysis of Russian antitrust policy, international perspective. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki=Higher School of Economics Economic Journal, 2007, vol.11, no.1, pp.89-123 (in Russian).
35. Commission Notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of Union competition law (C/2024/1645). Official Journal of the European Union, 22.02.2024. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:C_202401645 (accessed 12.05.2024).
36. Merger Guidelines. U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. December 18, 2023. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023_merger_guidelines_final_12.18.2023.pdf (accessed 12.05.2024).
37. Cunningham C., Ederer F., Ma S. Killer acquisitions. Journal of Political Economy, 2021, vol.129, no.3, pp.649-702. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3241707.
38. Stavniychuk А. Y., Markova О. А. “Acquire and leave”: Effects of startups acquisitions by digital ecosystems. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2023, vol.14, no.5, pp.83-105. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-5-6.
Review
For citations:
Shastitko A.E., Pavlova N.S. Deglobalization of the Internet: Myth or Reality? Journal of Modern Competition. 2024;18(4):65-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-4-65-82