Blind Spots in the Procedure for Analyzing the State of Competition in the Commodity Market

For the implementation of the “fifth antimonopoly package”, FAS Russia has developed a draft amendment to the Procedure for analyzing the state of competition in the commodity market, approved by Order of FAS Russia dated April 28, 2010 No. 220 (Procedure-220). This project is currently going through the stage of public discussion, which makes relevant its analysis in terms of the challenges of the economy of modern digital markets in general, as well as methodological issues raised by the latest amendments to the Federal Law “On the Protection of competition” of July 26, 2006 No. 135-FZ in particular. The article reveals that the provisions of the project under discussion do not address all the main problems that arise in connection with the analysis of competition in digital markets: methods for analyzing market boundaries at zero prices are not proposed, there are no approaches to assessing network effects, problems of market power in conglomerate mergers are not reflected, the concept of a multilateral market and its relationship with the digital platform has not been clarified. The draft also contains inaccurate wording, leaving freedom of interpretation, which will subsequently create risks of incorrect application of antimonopoly legislation and increase the likelihood of enforcement errors. In addition, the article demonstrates that within the framework of the proposed changes, many questions and problems that are also characteristic of the analysis of traditional markets (the second criterion of the hypothetical monopolist test, analysis of the surmountability of entry barriers, limitations in the use of methods) remain unanswered. Economic analysis of law and Industrial organization theory are used as the methodological basis for the study. The result of the analysis is a set of recommendations for the regulator aimed at reducing the likelihood of enforcement errors arising as a result of gaps antimonopoly regulation. The article is of an applied nature and may be of interest to both regulatory authorities and antitrust experts.

1. Avdasheva S. B., Yusupova G. F., Korneeva D. V. Competition legislation towards digital platforms: Choice between antitrust and regulation. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsypalnogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2022, no.3, pp.61-86 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-3-61-86.

2. Knyazeva I., Aitzhanov A., Bychkova Y. Methodological forks of antimonopoly regulation of digital markets: Ideas and meanings of the digital agenda of Kazakhstan. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2021, vol.15, no.2, pp.5-18 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2021-15-2-5-18.

3. Kovalenko A. I. Moving Away from Consumer Welfare in the Antitrust of Digital Platforms. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2021, vol.15, no.3, pp.97-105 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2021-15-3-97-105.

4. Markova O. A. Platform market definition: Accounting for network effects and pass-through effect. Voprosy teoreticheskoy ekonomiki=Issues of Economic Theory, 2022, no.3, pp.7-30 (in Russian). DOI: 10.52342/2587-7666VTE_2022_3_7_30.

5. Plekhanova L. S., Mashin I. S., Pavlova N. S. “Not that big”: Market power sources of digital platforms. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 6. Ekonomika=Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 2021, no.3, pp.82-105 (in Russian). DOI: 10.38050/01300105202135.

6. Shastitko A. A., Pavlova N. S., Shastitko A. E., Kurdin A. A. Ekonomicheskii analiz v primenenii norm antimonopol’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Economic analysis in the application of antimonopoly legislation]. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ., 2014, 216 p.

7. Shastitko A. E., Markova O. A. O podhodah k opredeleniyu granits rynkov s platformami [On approaches to defining the boundaries of markets with platforms]. Konkurentsiya i pravo, 2020, no.5, pp.12-23.

8. Shastitko A. E., Markova O. A. An old friend is better than two new ones? Approaches to market research in the context of digital transformation for the antitrust laws enforcement. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 2020, no.6, pp.37-55 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-37-55.

9. Shastitko A. E., Markova O. A. Approaches to the research of digital transformation effects. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 2019, no.3, pp.52-65 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S086904990005085-5.

10. Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S., Kashchenko N. V. Antitrust regulation of product ecosystems: The case study of Kaspersky Lab. – Apple Inc. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2020, vol.4, no.11, pp.29-42 (in Russian). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2020-11-4-3.

11. Farrell J., Shapiro C. Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition // The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. 2010. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 1–35. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1313782.

12. Global report on antitrust enforcement in the digital economy // International Chamber of Commerce. 25 September 2023. URL: https://iccwbo.org/news-publications/policies-reports/global-report-on-antitrust-enforcement-in-the-digital-economy/#single-hero-document (дата обращения: 03.10.2023).

13. Hoffmann L. Entitlement problems in digital markets and how antitrust shapes the appropriation of network externalities // Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. 2021. Vol. 22. No. 2. Article 17835917211003198. DOI: 10.1177/17835917211003198.

14. Khan L. Amazon’s antitrust paradox // Yale Law Journal. 2017. Vol. 126. No. 3. P. 710–805.

15. Newman J. Antitrust in digital markets // Vanderbilt Law Review. 2019. Vol. 72. No. 5. P. 1497–1561.

16. Newman J. Antitrust in zero-price markets: Applications // Washington University Law Review. 2016. Vol. 94. No. 1. P. 49–112.

17. OECD Handbook on Competition Policy in the Digital Age // OECD. 2022. URL: https://www.oecd.org/competition/digital-economy-innovation-and-competition.htm (дата обращения: 03.10.2023).

18. Parker G., Petropoulos G., Van Alstyne M. Digital platforms and antitrust. – In: The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation / ed. by E. Brousseau, J.-M. Glachant, J. Sgard. 2022. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190900571.013.34.

19. Pontual Ribeiro E., Golovanova S. A unified presentation of competition analysis in two-sided markets // Journal of Economic Surveys. 2020. Vol. 34. No. 1. P. 548–571. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12362.

20. Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 990–1029. DOI: 10.1162/154247603322493212.

21. U.S. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law of the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives // Investigation of Competition in Digital Markets. 2022. URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CPRT-117HPRT47832/pdf/CPRT-117HPRT47832.pdf (дата обращения: 03.10.2023).

22. Wang H. Platform antitrust in China // China Economic Journal. 2022. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 171–186. DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2022.2067688.

23. Wu Y. Is data-monopoly banned by antitrust law? Antitrust and digital economy in the US: Ideas, institutions, decisions and impacts, 1998-2023 // Studies in Social Science and Humanities. 2023. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 37–49.