The Compound Impact of Network Effects, Critical Mass, and Standartization on Competition in the Operating System Market

The competition policy mechanisms in specific sectors of the economy work out, provided that balanced protection tools are used, and incentives are maintained to launch a new product or technology onto the market. However, strong network effects lead to the presence of a small number of manufacturers or even a single player, which hinders the spread of alternative products and contributes to a single product network formation. The relevance of this research is driven by the need to competition analysis in the software market affected by the network effects. The purpose of this review article is to justify the need for a compound impact analysis of network effects, critical mass and standardization as an assessment optimization tool of the competition state in the two- sided software market, specifically in the operating systems markets. The object of the research is an operating system itself, and the subject is the influence of network effects, critical mass and standardization on competitive processes in the operating systems market. The following issues were performed: the results systematization of theoretical studies and approaches to econometric modeling of network externalities, the strategies identification for analysis of standards and installed base of users and sales, introduction of the operating system and software concepts, the development of recommendations for analysis of the phenomenon of network effects with an emphasis on the standardization process in the furtherance of competition and industrial policy. Analysis of the examined phenomena impact shows that the introduction of a generally accepted network effects definition at the legislative level, distinction between the direct and indirect network effects, consideration of this phenomenon as a barrier to entry into the market, and concord of the network effects and standard setting theory can decrease the possibility of type I and II errors in the law enforcement practice.

1. Федеральный закон от 26 июля 2006 г. № 135-ФЗ "О защите конкуренции" (с изм. и доп.) // Гарант. URL: https://base.garant.ru/12148517/(дата обращения: 14.07.2022).

2. Законопроект № 160280-8 "О внесении изменений в Федеральный закон "О защите конкуренции" (в части совершенствования антимонопольного регулирования "цифровых" рынков)" // СОЗД. URL: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/160280-8 (дата обращения: 14.07.2022).

3. Digital Services Act ***I // European Parliament. URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2022-0269_EN.html (дата обращения: 14.07.2022).

4. REGULATION (EU) 2022/… OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) // Council of the EU and the European Council. URL: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/56086/st08722-xx22.pdf (дата обращения: 14.07.2022).

5. Шаститко А. Е. Ошибки I и II рода в экономических обменах с участием третьей стороны-гаранта // Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2011. № 10 (10). С. 125-148.

6. Шаститко А. Е., Курдин А. А. Эффекты распространения рыночной власти владельцев ключевых мощностей на рынках программного обеспечения // Управленец. 2017. № 4 (68). С. 43-52.

7. Шаститко А. Е., Маркова О. А. Старый друг лучше новых двух? Подходы к исследованию рынков в условиях цифровой трансформации для применения антимонопольного законодательства // Вопросы экономики. 2020. № 6. С. 37-55. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-6-37-55.

8. Шаститко А. Е., Павлова Н. С. Широкие перспективы и овраги конкурентной политики // Экономическая политика. 2018. Т. 13. № 5. С. 110-133. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-5-110-133.

9. Шаститко А. Е., Паршина Е. Н. Рынки с двусторонними сетевыми эффектами: спецификация предметной области // Современная конкуренция. 2016. Т. 10. № 1 (55). С. 5-18.

10. Экономическая информатика. Введение в экономический анализ информационных систем: учебник / М. И. Лугачев [и др.]. - М.: Проспект, 2016. - 958 с.

11. Aker J. C. Information from markets near and far: Mobile phones and agricultural markets in Niger // American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. 2010. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 46-59. DOI: 10.1257/app.2.3.46.

12. Allen D. New telecommunications services: Network externalities and critical mass // Telecommunications Policy. 1988. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 257-271. DOI: 10.1016/0308-5961(88)90024-9.

13. Argentesi E., Filistrucchi L. Estimating market power in a two-sided market: The case of newspapers // Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2007. Vol. 22. No. 7. P. 1247-1266. DOI: 10.1002/jae.997.

14. Armstrong M.Competition in two-sided markets // The RAND Journal of Economics. 2006. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 668-691.

15. Asvanund A., Clay K., Krishnan R., Smith M. D. An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music-sharing networks // Information Systems Research. 2004. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 155-174. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.43378.

16. Basu A., Mazumdar T., Raj S. P. Indirect network externality effects on product attributes // Marketing Science. 2003. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 209-221. DOI: 10.1287/mksc.22.2.209.16037.

17. Belleflamme P., Peitz M. Platforms and network effects // Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization. Vol. II. - Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018. P. 286-317. DOI: 10.4337/9781788112789.00019.

18. Boudreau K. J. Let a thousand flowers bloom? An early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation // Organization Science. 2012. Vol. 23. No. 5. P. 1409-1427. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1826702.

19. Bresnahan T. New modes of competition: Implications for the future structure of the computer industry. - In: Competition, innovation and the Microsoft monopoly: Antitrust in the digital marketplace / ed. by J. A. Eisenach, Th. M. Lenard. - Boston; Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic, 1999. P. 155-208. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4407-0_9.

20. Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer Ch. F.Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market // Management Science. 1996. Vol. 42. No. 12. P. 1627-1647. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.42.12.1627.

21. Caillaud B., Jullien B. Chicken & egg: Competition among intermediation service providers // The RAND Journal of Economics. 2003. Vol. 34. No. 2. P. 309-328. DOI: 10.2307/1593720.

22. Church J., Gandal N.Complementary network externalities and technological adoption // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1993. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 239-260. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(93)90006-X.

23. Church J., Gandal N.Network effects, software provision, and standardization // Journal of Industrial Economics. 1992. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 85-103. DOI: 10.2307/2950628.

24. Church J., Gandal N. Strategic entry deterrence: Complementary products as installed base // European Journal of Political Economy. 1996. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 331-54. DOI: 10.1016/0176-2680(95)00020-8.

25. Church J., Gandal N. Systems competition, vertical merger, and foreclosure // Journal of Economics and Management Strategy. 2000. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 25-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2000.00025.x.

26. Cottrell T., Koput K. Software variety and hardware value: A case study of complementary network externalities in the microcomputer software industry // Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 1998. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 309-338. DOI: 10.1016/S0923-4748(98)00021-6.

27. David P. A., Shurmer M. Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Towards an institutional regime transformation? // Telecommunications Policy. 1996. Vol. 20. No. 10. P. 789-815. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(96)00060-2.

28. De Reuver M., Sørensen C., Basole R. C. The digital platform: a research agenda // Journal of Information Technology. 2018. Vol. 33. No. 2. P. 124-135. DOI: 10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.

29. Dewenter R., Haucap J., Luther R., Rötzel P. Hedonic prices in the German market for mobile phones // Telecommunications Policy. 2007. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 4-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2006.11.002.

30. Doganoglu T., Grzybowski L. Estimating network effects in mobile telephony in Germany // Information Economics and Policy. 2007. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 65-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2006.11.001.

31. Duan W., Gu B., Whinston A. B. Informational cascades and software adoption on the internet: An empirical investigation // MIS quarterly. 2009. Vol. 33. No. 1. P. 23-48. DOI: 10.2307/20650277.

32. Dubé J.-P. H., Hitsch G. J., Chintagunta P. K. Tipping and concentration in markets with indirect network effects // Marketing Science. 2010. Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 216-249. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1085909.

33. Economides N. Desirability of compatibility in the absence of network externalities // American Economic Review. 1989. Vol. 79. No. 5. P. 1165-1181.

34. Economides N., White L. J.Networks and compatibility: Implications for antitrust // European Economic Review. 1994. Vol. 38. No. 3-4. P. 651-662. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(94)90100-7.

35. Evans D. S., Schmalensee R. Catalyst code: the strategies behind the world's most dynamic companies. - Harvard Business School Press, 2007. - 228 p.

36. Evans D. S., Schmalensee R. Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses // Review of Network Economics. 2010. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 1-33. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1353502.

37. Evans D. S., Schmalensee R. The antitrust analysis of multi-sided platform businesses // National Bureau of Economic Research. 2013. Article 18783. Р. 1-71. DOI: 10.3386/w18783.

38. Evans D. S., Schmalensee R. The industrial organization of markets with two-sided platforms // National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper Series. 2005. Vol. 3. No. 11603. P. 1-37. DOI: 10.3386/w11603

39. Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation // The American economic review. 1986. Vol. 76. No. 5. P. 940-955.

40. Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation // The RAND Journal of Economics. 1985. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 70-83. DOI: 10.2307/2555589.

41. Filistrucchi L. Geradin D., van Damme E., Affeldt P. Market definition in two-sided markets: Theory and practice // Journal of Competition Law & Economics. 2014. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 293-339. DOI: 10.1093/joclec/nhu007.

42. Fjeldstad Ø. D., Becerra M., Narayanan S. Strategic action in network industries: an empirical analysis of the European mobile phone industry // Scandinavian Journal of Management. 2004. Vol. 20. No. 1-2. P. 173-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2004.05.007.

43. Foncel J., Ivaldi M. Operating system prices in the home PC market // Journal of Industrial Economics. 2005. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 265-297. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-1821.2005.00254.x.

44. Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y.-M.Network effects and the impact of free goods: An analysis of the web server market // International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 1999. Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 67-88. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.1999.11518349.

45. Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y.-M. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from web server pricing // MIS quarterly. 2002. Vol. 26. No. 4. P. 303-327. DOI: 10.2307/4132311.

46. Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical test for network externalities // The RAND Journal of Economics. 1994. Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 160-170. DOI: 10.2307/2555859.

47. Gandal N.Compatibility, standardization, and network effects: Some policy implications // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2002. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 80-91. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/18.1.80.

48. Goolsbee A., Klenow P. J. Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers // The Journal of Law and Economics. 2002. Vol. 45. No. 2. P. 317-343. DOI: 10.1086/344399.

49. Gowrisankaran G., Stavins J.Network externalities and technology adoption: Lessons from electronic payments. FRBSF Working Paper. 2002. P. 1-41. DOI: 10.24148/wp2002-16.

50. Grajek M. Estimating network effects and compatibility: Evidence from the Polish mobile market // Information Economics and Policy. 2010. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 130-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2009.07.002.

51. Hagiu A., Wright J. Multi-sided platforms // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2015. Vol. 43. P. 1-32.

52. Hyrynsalmi S., Suominen A., Mäntymäki M. The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems // Journal of Systems and Software. 2016. Vol. 111. P. 119-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.053.

53. Iimi A. Estimating demand for cellular phone services in Japan // Telecommunications Policy. 2005. Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 3-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2004.11.001.

54. Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 39. No. 8. P. 2255-2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904.

55. Katz M. L., Shapiro C.Network externalities, competition, and compatibility // The American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75. No. 3. P. 424-440.

56. Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress // Oxford Economic Papers. 1986. Vol. 38. P. 146-165. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041761.

57. Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Product introduction with network externalities // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1992. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 55-83. DOI: 10.2307/2950627.

58. Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 93-115. DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.2.93.

59. Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities // Journal of Political Economy. 1986. Vol. 94. No. 4. P. 822-841. DOI: 10.1086/261409.

60. Kauffman R. J., Wang B. New buyers' arrival under dynamic pricing market microstructure: The case of group-buying discounts on the Internet // Journal of Management Information Systems. 2001. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 157-188. DOI: 10.1080/07421222.2001.11045687.

61. Koski H., Kretschmer T. Entry, standards and competition: Firm strategies and the diffusion of mobile telephony // Review of Industrial Organization. 2005. Vol. 26. No. 1. P. 89-113. DOI: 10.1007/s11151-004-4085-0.

62. Lemley M. A., McGowan D. Legal implications of network economic effects // California Law Review. 1998. Vol. 86. P. 1-200. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.32212.

63. Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E.Network externality: An uncommon tragedy // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1994. Vol. 8. No. 2. P. 133-150. DOI: 10.1257/jep.8.2.133.

64. Lorenz H. W. Nonlinear dynamical economics and chaotic motion. - Berlin Springer, 1993. - 248 р.

65. Madden G., Coble-Neal G., Dalzell B. A dynamic model of mobile telephony subscription incorporating a network effect // Telecommunications Policy. 2004. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 133-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2003.12.002.

66. Majumdar S. K., Venkataraman S.Network effects and the adoption of new technology: evidence from the US telecommunications industry // Strategic Management Journal. 1998. Vol. 19. No. 11. P. 1045-1062. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(1998110)19:11<1045::AID-SMJ990>3.0.CO;2-0.

67. Matutes C., Regibeau P.Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1992. Vol. 40. No. 1. P. 37-54. DOI: 10.2307/2950626.

68. Matutes C., Regibeau P. Standardization across markets and entry // The Journal of Industrial Economics. 1989. Vol. 37. No. 4. P. 359-371. DOI: 10.2307/2098373.

69. Menell P. S. Economic analysis of network effects and intellectual property // Research Handbook on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law. Vol. 1: Theory. 2019. P. 1-87.

70. Menell P. S. The challenges of reforming intellectual property protection for computer software // Columbia Law Review. 1994. Vol. 94. No. 8. P. 2644-2654. DOI: 10.2307/1123151.

71. Nair H., Chintagunta P., Dubé J.-P. Empirical analysis of indirect network effects in the market for personal digital assistants // Quantitative Marketing and Economics. 2004. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 23-58. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.408280.

72. Ohashi H. The role of network effects in the US VCR market, 1978-1986 // Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 2003. Vol. 12. No. 4. P. 447-494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1430-9134.2003.00447.x.

73. Oren Sh. S., Smith S. A. Critical mass and tariff structure in electronic communications markets // The Bell Journal of Economics. 1981. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 467-487. DOI: 10.2307/3003567.

74. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. W., Jiang X. Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm // Boston University Questrom School of Business Research Paper, 2016. Article 2861574. P. 1-12.

75. Regibeau P., Rockett K. E. The timing of product introduction and the credibility of compatibility decisions // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1996. Vol. 14. No. 6. P. 801-823. DOI: 10.1016/0167-7187(95)01001-7.

76. Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets // Journal of the European Economic Association. 2003. Vol. 1. No. 4. P. 990-1029. DOI: 10.1162/154247603322493212.

77. Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. Two-sided markets: a progress report // The RAND Journal of Economics. 2006. Vol. 37. No. 3. P. 645-667. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00036.x.

78. Rysman M.Competition between networks: A study of the market for yellow pages // The Review of Economic Studies. 2004. Vol. 71. No. 2. P. 483-512. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.300450.

79. Rysman M. The economics of two-sided markets // Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2009. Vol. 23. No. 3. P. 125-143. DOI: 10.1257/jep.23.3.125.

80. Saloner G. Economic issues in computer interface standardization // Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 1990. Vol. 1. No. 1-2. P. 135-156. DOI: 10.1080/10438599000000008.

81. Saloner G., Shepard A. Adoption of technologies with network effects: an empirical examination of the adoption of automated teller machines. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1992. NBER Working Papers 4048.

82. Song P., Xue L., Rai A., Zhang C. The ecosystem of software platform: A study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance // Mis Quarterly. 2018. Vol. 42. No. 1. P. 121-142. DOI: 10.25300/MISQ/2018/13737.

83. Stremersch S., Tellis Gerard J., Binken J. L. G. Indirect network effects in new product growth // Journal of Marketing. 2007. Vol. 71. No. 3. P. 52-74. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.71.3.0.

84. Wade J. Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market // Strategic Management Journal. 1995. Vol. 16. No. S1. P. 111-133. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250160920.

85. Witt U. "Lock-in" vs. "critical masses" - industrial change under network externalities // International Journal of Industrial Organization. 1997. Vol. 15. No. 6. P. 753-773. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-7187(97)00010-6.