Management of knowledge of labor as a manifestation of the entrepreneurial competence of the employee in a competitive environment
https://doi.org/10.24411/1993-7598-2019-10305
EDN: MRHUDX
Abstract
The article presents a new vision of the labor behavior of an employee as a subject of competence of management of utility of the labor activity knowledge in a competitive environment. Solving the problem of disclosing the substantive aspects of competence and achieving the corresponding goal was carried out using a combination of methods: dialectic, systemic, mental experiment method, modeling method, logical methods and, accordingly, using elements of the dialectic, teleological systemic, competence approaches, and the principle of inconsistency. From the point of view of the principle of inconsistency, the phenomenon of knowledge of one's own labor activity (KOOLA) is revealed. KOOLA is understood as a set of labor actions of the employee, optimized for their usefulness and reflecting the knowledge of the employee on the labor activity in general. KOOLA is shown as consisting of its various parties, because in the process of formalization it is differentiated into many parts - labor actions knowledge, which are determined by the subject of competence in terms of total and marginal utility. In this sense, an employee can act as an entrepreneur, where purposefully exercising the management of the utility of KOOLA, involving the consumption of labor actions knowledge with greater or lesser utility, also leads to greater competitiveness in the conditions of market relations and labor interaction with other competing employees, as subjects of KOOLA and, potentially, subjects of competence. The results obtained in this work can be used in further studies of the potential of entrepreneurial competence of managing of KOOLA from the point of view of employee competitiveness, and can also be recommended for use, as part of the existing system of general and special education to prepare a modern competitive specialist, and in terms of corporate training to improve the competitiveness of the labor behavior of employees.
References
1. Беланов И. С. Технологии управления знаниями в инновационной организации: автореф. дис.... канд. экон. наук: 08.00.05. М., 2017. - 27 с.
2. Бём-Баверк О. фон. Избранные труды о ценности, проценте и капитале. М.: Эксмо, 2009. - 909 с.
3. Богунов Л. А. Развитие компетенции управленческого экономического мышления менеджера в условиях современной конкуренции (на примере менеджеров Северо-Казахстанской области) // Современная конкуренция. 2017. №6 (66). С. 108-120.
4. Губенский Е. Ф., Кораблева Г.В., Лутченко В. А. Философский энциклопедический словарь. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2005. - 576 с.
5. Менгер К. Избранные работы. М.: Издательский дом «Территория будущего», 2005. - 496 с.
6. Мильнер Б. З. Управление знаниями: эволюция и революция в организации. М.: Инфра-М, 2003. - 177 с.
7. Нонака И., Такеучи Х. Компания - создатель знания: зарождение и развитие инноваций в японских фирмах. М.: ЗАО «Олимп-Бизнес», 2011. - 366 с.
8. Парето В. Учебник политической экономии. М.: ИНФРА-М, 2018. - 591 с.
9. Погорелова Е. В. Теоретические и методологические основы управления знаниями в организации: автореф. дис.... докт. экон. наук: 08.00.05. Самара, 2011. - 48 с.
10. Фролов И. Т. Философский словарь. 5-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1987. - 590 с.
11. Alonso A. D., Kok S., Sakellarios N., O'Brien S. Micro Enterprises, Self-Efficacy And Knowledge Acquisition: Evidence From Greece And Spain // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2019. Vol. 23. № 3. Рр. 419-438. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-02-2018-0118.
12. Ahmad N., Saeed M., Zaman L., Naseem I. Knowledge Management: A Gateway For Organizational Performance // Journal Of The Knowledge Economy. 2017. Vol. 8. № 3. Рр. 859-876. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-015-0282-3.
13. Appel-Meulenbroek R. Knowledge Sharing Through Co-Presence: Added Value Of Facilities // Facilities. 2010. Vol. 28. № 3/4. Рр. 189-205. DOI: 10.1108/02632771011023140.
14. Batarseh F. S., Usher J. M., Daspit J. J. Absorptive Capacity In Virtual Teams: Examining The Influence On Diversity And Innovation // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2017. Vol. 21. № 6. Рр. 1342-1361. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2016-0221.
15. Burnette М. Tacit Knowledge Sharing Among Library Colleagues: A Pilot Study // Reference Services Review. 2017. Vol. 45. № 3. Рр. 382-397. DOI: 10.1108/RSR-11-2016-0082.
16. Calic G., Helie S., Bontis N., Mosakowski E. Creativity From Paradoxical Experience: A Theory Of How Individuals Achieve Creativity While Adopting Paradoxical Frames // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2019. Vol. 23. № 3. Pр. 397-418. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0223.
17. Dima A.M., Vasilache S. Social Network Analysis For Tacit Knowledge Management In Universities // Journal Of The Knowledge Economy. 2015. Vol. 6. № 4. Pр. 856-864. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-013-0151-x.
18. Gunther J., Meissner D. Clusters As Innovative Melting Pots? The Meaning Of Cluster Management For Knowledge Diffusion In Clusters // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2017. Vol. 8. № 2. Pр. 499-512. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-017-0467-z.
19. Herschel R. T., Nemati H., Steiger D. Tacit To Explicit Knowledge Conversion: Knowledge Exchange Protocols // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2001. Vol. 5. № 1. Pр. 107-116. DOI: 10.1108/13673270110384455.
20. Law K. K., Chan A., Ozer M. Towards An Integrated Framework Of Intrinsic Motivators, Extrinsic Motivators And Knowledge Sharing // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2017. Vol. 21. № 6. Pр. 1486-1502. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-03-2016-0119.
21. Lopez-Varela A. Theoretical And Methodological Approaches To Social Sciences And Knowledge Management. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012. - 392 p.
22. Lowik S., Kraaijenbrink J., Groen A. J. Antecedents And Effects Of Individual Absorptive Capacity: A Micro-Foundational Perspective On Open Innovation // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2017. Vol. 21. № 6. Pр. 13191341. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0410.
23. Nguyen T., Ngo L., Northey G., Siaw C. Realising The Value Of Knowledge Resources And Capabilities: An Empirical Study // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2019. Vol. 23. № 2. Pр. 374-395. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0372.
24. Obeso M., Sarabia M. Knowledge And Enterprises In Developing Countries: Evidences From Chile // Journal Of The Knowledge Economy. 2018. Vol. 9. № 3. Pр. 854-870. DOI: 10.1007/s13132-016-0374-8.
25. Patel N. V., Ghoneim A. Managing Emergent Knowledge Through Deferred Action Design Principles: The Case Of Ecommerce Virtual Teams // Journal Of Enterprise Information Management. 2011. Vol. 24. № 5. Pр. 424439. DOI: 10.1108/17410391111166503.
26. Rosario C. R., Kipper L. M., Frozza R., Mariani B. B. Methodology For Acquisition Of Collective Tacit Knowledge Used In Diagnosis Of Defect Cause In Industrial Processes // VINE. 2015. Vol. 45. № 1. Pр. 22-45. DOI: 10.1108/VINE-03-2013-0013.
27. Sharkie R. Knowledge Creation And Its Place In The Development Of Sustainable Competitive Advantage // Journal Of Knowledge Management. 2003. Vol. 7. № 1. Pр. 20-31. DOI: 10.1108/13673270310463590.
Review
For citations:
Bogunov L. Management of knowledge of labor as a manifestation of the entrepreneurial competence of the employee in a competitive environment. Journal of Modern Competition. 2019;13(3):45-57. https://doi.org/10.24411/1993-7598-2019-10305. EDN: MRHUDX