Preview

Journal of Modern Competition

Advanced search

The propensity to a breach the cartel in competition a la Bertrand

EDN: XVBVCV

Abstract

Traditional approaches to collusion involving small number of participants and the strategy of endless retaliation, predict a sufficiently low discount rate necessary for self-support of the cartel. Presented in the article model with a large number of participants and the strategies of vengeance, time-limited, shows the cartel as a relatively unstable economic institute in situation a-la Bertrand The simulation results suggest that even for the situation in the presence of a duopoly strategy «four eye for an eye» and more going situation quite similar to the strategy of endless retribution. The analysis comes to the following conclusions. 1. If the number of periods of retaliation is less than the number of participants in the cartel, the collusion strategy will always be ineffective. 2. With the same increase in the number of participants in the cartel and retaliation periods propensity to violate cartel will increase. 3. In terms of the total amount of certain factors cartel participants is more important to break the cartel in comparison with the number of periods during which the wages.Introduction to model the behavior of the factors of incomplete observability cartel participants to each other and the likelihood of reduced demand for goods and services produced by cartel members, increases the chances of opportunistic behavior.

About the Author

N. Klikunov
Kursk Institute of Management, Economy and Business


References

1. Баумоль Уильям Дж. Состязательные рынки: мятеж в теории структуры отрасли // Вехи экономической мысли. Теория отраслевых рынков. Т. 5. СПб.: Экономическая школа, 2003. С. 110-141.

2. Вериан Хэлл Р. Микроэкономика. Промежуточный уровень. Современный подход: учебник для вузов / пер. с англ. под ред. Н. Л. Фроловой. М.: ЮНИТИ, 1997.

3. Пиндайк Р., Рубинфельд Д. Микроэкономика: пер. с англ. 2-е изд. М.: Дело, 2001. - 808 с.

4. Смит Адам. Монополия и свободная торговля. URL: http://r-e-e-d.com/smith-monopoly-and-free-trade/

5. Barro Roberto. Macroeconomics. U. S.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1992. - 599p.

6. Cabral Luis M. B. Introduction to industrial organization. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. - 354 p.

7. Dixit Avinash K., Nalebuff Barry J. Thinking strategically: the competitive edge in business, politics, and everyday life // Dixit, Avinash K. and Barry J. Nalebuff. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 1991 // Ch. 8. Brinkmanship.

8. Koski Heli, Kretschmer Tobias. Survey on Competing in Network Industries: Firm Strategies, Markert Outcomes, and Policy Implications // Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Bank Papers. 5-31. 2004.

9. Nicholson Walter. Microeconomic theory. Basic principles and extensions. Thomson, Inc., 2005. Ch. 14. Traditional models of imperfect competition.

10. Shapiro C. and Varian H. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. HBS Press: Cambridge, Mass, 1999. Ch. 7.


Review

For citations:


Klikunov N. The propensity to a breach the cartel in competition a la Bertrand. Journal of Modern Competition. 2016;10(5):47-53. EDN: XVBVCV

Views: 2


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-7598 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0657 (Online)