Место концепции предпринимательской ориентации в современных управленческих исследованиях

В статье предпринята попытка показать место концепции предпринимательской ориентации (ПО) в теории стратегического менеджмента через рассмотрение основных теоретических подходов, используемых в современных исследованиях для объяснения роли ПО в фирме. В частности, предлагается рассматривать роль ПО в рамках идей школ проектирования и планирования в теории стратегического управления как механизма адаптации фирмы к условиям внешней среды и в контексте ресурсной концепции как уникального организационного ресурса, способного повысить результаты деятельности фирмы и ее конкурентоспособность. В обоих направлениях может быть применен как ситуационный, так и конфигурационный подход к исследованию взаимосвязей ПО, основных характеристик деловой среды фирмы и результатов ее деятельности. При ситуационном подходе подразумевается, что эффективность управленческих методов зависит от ряда контекстуальных факторов, и рассматриваются двумерные взаимосвязи между элементами. При конфигурационном подходе, исходя из того же допущения предполагается рассмотрение целых систем взаимосвязей контекстуальных переменных. В работе представлена интеллект-карта, демонстрирующая место концепции предпринимательской ориентации в современных управленческих исследованиях, сформулированы различия основных теоретических подходов к изучению предпринимательской ориентации фирмы.

1. Катькало В. С. Эволюция теории стратегического управления: монография. Спб.: Издат. дом С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 2006. - 548 с

2. Коваленко А. И., Зарецких С. А. Дискуссия о профессионально-ориентированном подходе к предпринимательству // Современная конкуренция. 2012. Т. 6. № 3 (33). С. 3-8

3. Куликов А. В., Широкова Г. В. Внутрифирменные ориентации и их влияние на рост: опыт российских малых и средних предприятий // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2010. № 3. C. 3-34

4. Рубин Ю. Б. Российское предпринимательство как направление российского образования // Современная конкуренция. 2012. Т. 6. №6 (36). С. 5-8

5. Широкова Г. В. Предпринимательская ориентация: истоки концепции и основные подходы к исследованию // Российский журнал менеджмента. 2012. № 3. С. 55-72

6. Широкова Г. В., Шаталов А. И. Факторы результативности деятельности новых российских компаний // Вестник СПбГУ. Серия Менеджмент. 2007. № 3. C. 59-82

7. Arbaugh J. B., Cox L. W., Camp M. Is entrepreneurial orientation a global construct? A multicountry study of entrepreneurial orientation, growth strategy, and performance. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 2009, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 12-25

8. Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-120

9. Boso n., Story V. M., Cadogan J. M. Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation, network ties, and performance: Study of entrepreneurial firms in a developing economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 2013, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 708-727

10. Cantillon R. Essay on the nature of general commerce, 1892, Macmillan, London

11. Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 1988, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 217-234

12. Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75-87

13. Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm’s Behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1991, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 7-25

14. Cyert R., March J. A behavioural theory of the firm, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963

15. Daft R. Organizaition theory and design. South-Western, Cengage Learning, 2010

16. Dai L., Maksimov V., Gilbert B. A., Fernhaber S. A.Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: the differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 2014, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 511-524

17. Dess G. G., Lumpkin G. T., Covin J. G. Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 677-695

18. Dess G., newport S., Rasheed A. Configuration research in strategic management: Key issues and suggestions. Joumal of Management, 1993, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 775-795

19. Downing S. The social construction of entrepreneurship: narrative and dramatic processes in the coproduction of organizations and identities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 185-204

20. Filser M., Eggers F., Craus S., Malovics E. The effect of financial resource availability on entrepreneurial orientation, customer orientation and firm performance in an international context: an empirical analysis from Austria and Hungary. Journal for East European Management Studies, 2014, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 7-30

21. Frank H., Kessler A., Fink M. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance - a replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 2010, vol. 62, pp. 175-198

22. Grande J., Madsen E., Borch O. The relationship between resources, entrepreneurial orientation and performance in farm-based ventures. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 2011, vol. 23, no. 3-4, pp. 89-111

23. Grant R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 1991, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 114-135

24. Hart S. L. An integrative framework for strategy-making processes. Academy of Management Review, 1992, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 327-351

25. Hult G. T. M., Hurley R. F., Knight G. A. Innovativeness: its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing and Management, 2004, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 429-438

26. Khandwalla P. n. Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 1976-1977, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 21-51

27. Khandwalla P. n. The design of effective top management style. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 1977, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 41-55

28. Kreiser P. M., Davis J. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 2010, 23,no. 1, pp. 56-71

29. Li H., Zhang Y., Chan T. S. Entrepreneurial strategy making and performance in China's new technology ventures - the contingency effect of environments and firm competences. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2005, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 57-67

30. Li Y., Zhao Y., Tan J., Liu Y. Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: evidence from Chinese small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 2008, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 113-133

31. Lieberman M., Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, vol. 9, pp. 41-58

32. Lisboa A., Skarmeas D., Lages C. Entrepreneurial orientation, exploitative and explorative capabilities, and performance outcomes in export markets: a resource-based approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1274-1284

33. Lumpkin G. T., Dess G. G. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 1996, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 135-172

34. Madsen E. The significance of sustained entrepreneurial orientation on performance of firms - A longitudinal analysis. Entrepreneurship& Regional Development, 2007, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185-204

35. Makadok R. Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 387-401

36. Martins I., Rialp A. Entrepreneurial orientation, environmental hostility and SME profitability: a contingency approach. Cuadernos de Gestión, 2013, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 67-88

37. Miles R. E., Snow C. C. Organizational strategy, structure and process. 1978, N. Y.: McGraw-Hill

38. Miller D. The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 1983, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 770-791

39. Miller D., Friesen P. H. Strategy making in context: ten empirical archetypes. The Journal of Management Studies, 1977, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 253-280

40. Miller D., Friesen P. H. Archetypes of strategy formulation. Management Science, 1978, vol. 24,pp. 294-316

41. Miller D. Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 1987, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 7-32

42. Mintzberg H. Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 1973, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 44-53

43. Strategy formation: Schools of thought. In: Fredrickson J. W. (ed.). Perspectives on Strategic Management. Harper Business: N. Y., pp. 105-236

44. Moreno A., Casillas J. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of SMEs: A Causal Model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2008, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 507-528

45. Rauch A., Wiklund J., Lumpkin G. T., Frese M. Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2009, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 761-787

46. Richard O. C., Barnett T., Dwyer S., Chadwick K. Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 255-268

47. Romanelli E. New venture strategies in the microcomputer industry. California Management Review,1987, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 160-175

48. Rumelt R. P., Schendel D. E., and Teece D. J. Fundamental issues in trategy in Rumelt R. P., Schendel D. E., and Teece D. J. (ed.). Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1994, 9-47

49. Saeed S., Yousafzai S., Engelen A. On Cultural and Macroeconomic Contingencies of the Entrepreneurial Orientation-Performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 255-290

50. Sarasvathy S. D. Entrepreneurship as a science of the artificial. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2003, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 203-220

51. Sarasvathy S. D. Making it happen: beyond theories of the firm to theories of firm design. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2004, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 519-531

52. Shane S., Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 2000, vol. 25, pp. 217-226

53. Schumpeter J. A. The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, 1934, Cambridge, MA

54. Simon H. Administrative Behavior, Macmillan, N. Y.,1957

55. Su Z., Xie E., Yuang L. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in new ventures and established firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 2011, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 558-577

56. Tang J., Tang Z., Marino L. D., Zhang Y., Li Q. Exploring and inverted u-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2008, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 219-239

57. Van Burg E., Romme L. Creating the future together: toward a framework for research synthesis in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2014, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 369-397

58. Van Burg E., Romme A., Gilsing V. A., Reymen I. M. M. J. Creating university spin-offs: a science-based design perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2008, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 114-128

59. Doorn S. Van, Jansen J. J., Bosch F. A. Van den, Volberda H. W. Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: drawing attention to the senior team. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 821-836

60. Venkatraman n. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: the construct, dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 1989, vol. 35, pp. 942-962

61. Vij S., Bedi H. S. Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: a review of literature, IUP. Journal of Business Strategy, 2012, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 17-31

62. Wales W. J., Lumpkin G. T., Ensley M. D. Linking new venture entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: a multidimensional model of organizational structure moderation. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2006, vol. 26, no. 15, article 8

63. Wales W. J., Patel P. C., Parida V., Kreiser P. M.Nonlinear effects of entrepreneurial orientation on small firm performance: the moderating role of resource orchestration capabilities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2013, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 93-121

64. Welter F. Contextualizing entrepreneurship: conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2011, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 165-184

65. Wernerfelt B. The resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171-180

66. Wiklund J., Shepherd D. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1307-1314

67. Wiklund J., Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71-91

68. Wiklund J., Shepherd D. Where to from here? EO-as-experementation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2011, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 925-946

69. Yamada K., Eshima Y. Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation: Longitudinal Analysis of Small Technology Firms in Japan. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2009, pp. 1-6

70. Zahra S. A. Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1991, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 259-285