Diffuse entrepreneurship and the very heart of "made in Italy", for fashion and luxury goods
EDN: RVTHOL
Аннотация
«Made in Italy» is a worldwide label for fashion and luxury brands. It suggests top quality as well as a sense of distinction and it is closely linked to famous brand names as well as entre- preneurs like Giorgio Armani, Miuccia Prada, Gianni Versace. Nevertheless, behind the sparkling names, made in Italy hides a set of entrepreneurial forms that are at the heart of peculiar Italian savoir-faire for fashion and luxury goods and that were, indeed, at the heart of the economic development of the country. Design, production and distribution of fashion and luxury goods in Italy have solid foundations in a diffuse network of independent enterprises that ensured economic and cultural development and innovation. The free, yet coordinated, initiative of small entrepreneurs, firmly rooted in the traditional structure of the Italian society, constitute the economic and social fabric behind the success of some of the well known large groups of the high end of the fashion and luxury system. This fabric of diffuse entrepreneurship is also actually ensuring the necessary variety of initiatives and countermeasures to face the crisis of this sector and to invent new solutions against the de-manufacturing and the fierce concurrence of the developing countries.
Список литературы
1. Abrahamson E. (1996). Management Fashion, The academy of Management review, Vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 254-285.
2. Aldric, H. E. (2005). entrepreneurship, in Smelser n. J. and Swendberg r., The Handbook of economic Sociology (second edition), Princeton and oxford, Princeton university Press, pp. 451-477.
3. Aspers P. (2006). Designing for the other: using knowledge to upgrade in the garment industry, Max Planck Institut fur Gesellschaftforschung, Discussion Paper 09/06.
4. Bourdieu P. (1996). The forms of capital, in richardson, e. G., Handbook of Theory and research for the Sociology oof education, Westport, conn., Grenwood Press.
5. Burt R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas, american Journal of Sociology, Vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 349-399.
6. Djelic M-L., Ainamo A. (1999). The coevolution of new organizational Forms in the Fashion Industry: a Historical and comparative Study of France, Italy, and the united States, organization Science, Vol. 10, no. 5, Focused Issue: coevolution of Strategy and new organizational Forms, pp. 622-637.
7. Bagnasco A. (1977). Tre italie: la problematica territoriale dello sviluppo, bologna: Il Mulino.
8. Brusco S. (1982). The emilian model: productive decentralization and social integration, cambridge Journal of economics, 6, pp. 167-184.
9. Burt R. S. (1995). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of competition, cambridge, Mass. Harvard university Press. (2004) Structural holes and good ideas, american Journal of Sociology, Vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 349-399.
10. Chiapello E. (1998). artistes versus managers. le management culturel face à la critique artiste, Paris, Me′tailie′.
11. Fallers L. (1954). a note on the «Trickle effect», The Public opinion Quarterly, Vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 314-321.
12. Giusti N. (2009). Introduzione allo studio della moda, bologna: Il Mulino. (2009a) Il designer di moda, «man-in-the-middle» e intermediario culturale, rassegna italiana di Sociologia, 2009, 4, pp. 579-607. (2011a) le travail en atelier comme forme d'organisation du processus de cre′ation dans la Mode, Sociologie et Socie′te′s, XlIII, no. 1, pp. 149-173.
13. Kat E. e Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass-communications, Glencoe, The Free Press (The Trans- action edition, 2006).
14. Kawamura Y. (2005). Fashionology, oxford, new York, berg.
15. Lazerson M. (1995). a new Phoenix? Modern Putting out in the Modena Knitwear Industry, administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 34-59.
16. Le′vi-Strauss C. (1958). anthropologie structurale, Paris, Plon.
17. March J. G. (1991). exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, organization Science, Vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 71-87.
18. Merton R. K. (1949). Social Theory and social structure. revised and enlarged edition, 1957, Glencoe, the Free Press.
19. Mora E. (2006). collective production of creativity in the Italian fashion system, Poetics, Vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 334-353.
20. Pe′retz H. (1992). le vendeur, la vendeuse et leur cliente. ethnographie du prêt-à-porter de luxe, revue Française de Sociologie, XXXIII, pp. 49-72.
21. Perry Smith, J., Shalley, (2003). The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective, academy of Management review, Vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 89-106.
22. Peterson R, Anand N. (2004). The production of culture perspective, annual review of Sociology, no. 30, pp. 311-334.
23. Peterson R. A., Berger D. G. (1971). entrepreneur- ship in organizations: evidence from the popular music industry, administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97-106.
24. Cycles in symbol production, the case of popular music (1975), american Sociological review, no. 40, pp. 158-173.
25. (1996), Measuring Industry concentration, Diversity, and Innovation in Popular Music, american Socio- logical review, Vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 175-178.
26. R-I. ricerche e interventi di politica industriale e del lavoro (2011). osservatorio del settore tessile e abigliamento nel distretto di carpi, 10 rapporto, giugno 2011.
27. Ricchetti M. e Cietta E. (eds.) (2006). Il valore della moda. Industria e servizi in un settore guidato dall’innovazione, bruno Mondadori, Milano.
28. Rivoli P. (2005). The travels of a t-shirt in the Global economy, Hoboken, n. J., John Wiley and Sons.
29. Thompson J. D. (1967). organizations in action, new York, McGraw-Hill.
30. Schumpeter J. (1934). Theory of economic development, cambridge, Mass., Harvard university Press.
31. Smelse N. J. and Swendberg R. (2005). The Handbook of economic Sociology (second edition), Princeton and oxford, Princeton university Press.
32. Stinchcombe A. L. (1959). bureaucratic and craft administration of Production: a comparative Study, administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 168-187.
33. Uzzi B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness in the economic performance of organizations: the network effect, american Sociological review, Vol. 61, pp. 674-698.
34. Veblen T. (1899). The Theory of the leisure class. an economic study of Institutions, new York, The Macmillan company.
35. White N. (2000). reconstructing Italian Fashion. america and the Development of the Italian Fashion Industry, oxford, new York, berg.
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Giusti N. Diffuse entrepreneurship and the very heart of "made in Italy", for fashion and luxury goods. Современная конкуренция. 2013;(1):58-64. EDN: RVTHOL
For citation:
Giusti N. Diffuse entrepreneurship and the very heart of "made in Italy", for fashion and luxury goods. Journal of Modern Competition. 2013;(1):58-64. EDN: RVTHOL
Послать статью по эл. почте 