Comparative Analysis of the Concepts of “Market Power” and “Bargaining Power” in the Context of Antitrust Regulation

The article aims to distinguish the concepts of market power and bargaining power, which remains relevant in the conditions of modern antitrust regulation. The paper describes the current approaches to understanding these phenomena. An attempt is made to include not only market power but also bargaining power into the theoretical model. It analyzes real situations in which a correct understanding of market power and bargaining power was crucial for deciding on the need to apply antitrust regulation measures. To date, antitrust regulation has been focusing on the consideration of market power only, but when determining the justification for the application of certain effects, it is necessary to take into account that the manifestations of market power may be similar to the effects of asymmetry in the distribution of bargaining power, as well as to clearly distinguish between these phenomena. It is noted that each case requires an individual approach to assessing the impact on public welfare of both the phenomena themselves and the applied regulatory impacts. Results of this article may be useful for a more detailed analysis of the market in case of antitrust proceedings, reducing the probability of making type I and II errors in antitrust regulation.

1. Galbraith J. K. Innocent fraud. Across the Board, 2004, vol.41, no.2, pp.1-10.

2. Davis P., Garcés E. Quantitative techniques for competition and antitrust analysis. Princeton University Press, 2009, 560 p. DOI: 10.1515/9781400831869.

3. Landes W. M., Posner R. A. An economic theory of intentional torts. International Review of Law and Economics, 1981, vol.1, no.2, pp.127-154. DOI: 10.1016/0144-8188(81)90012-0.

4. Tirole J. Market failures and public policy. American Economic Review, 2015, vol.105, no.6, pp.16651682. DOI: 10.1257/aer.15000024.

5. Mankiw N. G. Principles of economics. Cengage, 2023, 816 p.

6. Pindyck R. S., Rubinfeld D. L., Rabasco E. Microeconomia. Pearson Educación, 2013, 743 p.

7. Wagner R. H. Economic interdependence, bargaining power, and political influence. International Organization, 1988, vol.42, no.3, pp.461-483. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027703.

8. Lewis M. S., Pflum K. E. Diagnosing hospital system bargaining power in managed care networks. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2015, vol.7, no.1, pp.243-274. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20130009.

9. Monopsony and Buyer Power. OECD, 17.12.2009. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/monopsony-and-buyer-power_36a2b824-en.html (accessed 20.04.2024).

10. Shastitko A. E., Pavlova N. S. Bargaining Power and Market Power: Comparison and Policy Implications. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii=The Journal of the New Economic Association, 2017, no.2(34), pp.39-57 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2017-34-2-2.

11. Spektor S. V., Ionkina K. A. Estimating the effects of legalizing drug e-commerce. Population and Economics, 2023, vol.7, no.1, pp.90-115. DOI: 10.3897/popecon.7.e96523.

12. Brandow G. E. Market power and its sources in the food industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1969, vol.51, no.1, pp.1-12. DOI: 10.2307/1238302.

13. Meleshkina A. I. Foreign competition as a factor defining geographic boundaries of market. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul'teta. Elektronnyi zhurnal=Scientific Researches of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal, 2021, vol.13, no.4(42), pp.21-33 (in Russian). DOI: 10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-4-21-33.

14. Knyazeva I., Zaikin N. The Phenomenon of Bargaining Power on the Competitive Product Markets. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya=Journal of Modern Competition, 2022, vol.16, no.4, pp.5-18 (in Russian). DOI: 10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-5-18.

15. Polinsky A. M., Shavell S. The optimal tradeoff between the probability and magnitude of fines. The American Economic Review, 1979, vol.69, no.5, pp.880-891.

16. Smith V. Eksperimental'naya ekonomika. Kompleks issledovanii, po sovokupnosti kotorykh avtoru prisuzhdena Nobelevskaya premiya [Experimental Economics: A Collection of Studies That Earned the Nobel Prize]. Sotsium Publ., 2020, 798 p.

17. Smith R. J. Eli Lilly Agrees Not to Monopolize Insulin Market. Science, 1979, vol.206, no.4414, pp.34-35. DOI: 10.1126/science.206.4414.34.

18. Rajkumar S. V. The high cost of insulin in the United States: an urgent call to action. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2020, vol.95, no.1, pp.22-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.11.013.

19. Reshenie № 05/87758/19 po delu № 1-10-192/00-05-17 ot 8 oktyabrya 2019 g. [Decision no. 05/87758/19 in case no. 1-10-192/00-05-17 dated October 8, 2019]. FAS. Available at: https://br.fas.gov.ru/ca/upravlenie-kontrolya-promyshlennosti/82795675-812b-4c5a-abd0-5fc71c12bdc0/ (accessed 20.04.2024).

20. Shastitko A. E., Meleshkina A. I., Dozmarov K. V. Error risks under antitrust law enforcement: Effects of demand and supply shocks. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2019, vol.10, no.3, pp.2-13 (in Russian). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-3-1.

21. Analiz sostoyaniya konkurentsii na rynke grafitirovannykh elektrodov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Analysis of the state of competition in the graphite electrodes market in the Russian Federation]. FAS. Available at: https://fas.gov.ru/documents/686291?ysclid=m1gtv5wa4s637205848 (accessed 20.04.2024).

22. Reshenie № AD/91667-DSP/20 po delu № 11/01/11-29/2019 ot 21 oktyabrya 2020 g. [Decision no. AD/91667-DSP/20 on case no. 11/01/11-29/2019 dated October 21, 2020]. FAS. Available at: https://br.fas.gov.ru/ca/upravlenie-regulirovaniya-svyazi-i-informatsionnyh-tehnologiy/a7649c585435-486f-940c-307fb1002a0c/ (accessed 20.04.2024).

23. Shastitko A. E., Meleshkina A. I., Markova O. A. The market regulation triad: Antitrust, industrial policy and protectionism in the optical fiber market. Upravlenets=The Manager, 2021, vol.12, no.1, pp.4761 (in Russian). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2021-12-1-4.

24. Shastitko A. E., Kurdin A. A., Markova O. A. et al. Konkurentsiya i konkurentnaya politika. Na styke budushchego i proshlogo [Competition and competition policy. At the junction of the future and the past]. Moscow, «Delo» RANEPA Publ, 2019, 68 p.

25. Shastitko A., Pavlova N. Antitrust in bilateral monopoly. Voprosy ekonomiki, 2017, no.8, pp.75-91 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-8-75-91.

26. Blair R., Kaserman D., Romano R. A pedagogical treatment of bilateral monopoly. Southern Economic Journal, 1989, vol.55, no.4, pp.831-841. DOI: 10.2307/1059465.

27. Reshenie № 05/36813/17 po delu № 1-10-172/00-05-15 ot 1 iyunya 2017 g. [Decision no. 05/36813/17 in case no. 1-10-172/00-05-15 dated June 1, 2017]. FAS. Available at: https://br.fas.gov.ru/ca/upravlenie-kontrolya-promyshlennosti/05-36813-17/?query=%D1%80%D1%83%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BB%20%D0%BC%D0%BC%D0%BA (accessed 20.04.2024).

28. Kuternin M. I. On the possibility of market price regulation for socially significant goods. Innovatsii i investitsii=Innovation and Investment, 2021, no.2, pp.118-121 (in Russian).

29. Radaev V. V. Market power and market exchange: Retailer-supplier relationships in contemporary Russia. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta=Russian Management Journal, 2009, vol.7, no.2, pp.3-30 (in Russian).

30. Obobshchennyi analiz FAS Rossii po soderzhaniyu dogovorov postavki [Generalized analysis of the FAS Russia on the content of supply contracts]. FAS, 13.03.2007. Available at: https://fas.gov.ru/documents/-51844609-171b-478e-af73-63b06f15032d (accessed 05.04.2025).

31. Protokol № 1 zasedaniya ekspertnogo soveta pri FAS Rossii po razvitiyu konkurentsii v sfere roznichnoi torgovli ot 12 marta 2007 goda [Protocol no. 1 of the meeting of the expert council under the FAS Russia on the development of competition in the field of retail trade dated March 12, 2007]. FAS, 20.03.2007. Available at: https://fas.gov.ru/p/protocols/270?ysclid=m94o5ifgkk543494635 (accessed 05.04.2025).

32. Analiz polozheniya krupnykh torgovykh setei na roznichnom rynke prodovol'stviya Sankt-Peterburga i praktiki ikh vzaimodeistviya s predpriyatiyami – postavshchikami prodovol'stviya [Analysis of the position of large retail chains in the retail food market of St. Petersburg and the practice of their interaction with enterprises – food suppliers]. FAS, 06.10.2006. Available at: https://fas.gov.ru/documents/575511?ysclid=m94pscxx5r366447246 (accessed 05.04.2025).

33. Radaev V. V. Who Benefited from the New Trade Law. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal'nogo upravleniya=Public Administration Issues, 2012, no.2, pp.33-59 (in Russian).