Concept Development of Educational Protectionism in the History of Economic Thought
https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-2-118-133
Abstract
An important issue within the framework of economic theory has always been the problem of the relationship between free trade and protectionist measures to protect domestic production. At a certain stage, the ideology of free trade (developed by Adam Smith, David Ricardo) became the mainstream of economic thought. Later, within the framework of the German Historical school, an important contribution was made by the economist Friedrich List, who proposed the concept of educational protectionism as an alternative to the free trade ideology of classical political economy. In this article it is proposed to analyze the main ideas and arguments of the concept of educational protectionism and compare them with the argumentation of other economic schools. Were described the characteristics of the German Historical school. It was shown, that despite some similar ideas, the concept of educational protectionism is very different from mercantilist ideas, this concept does not deny free trade direction from a historical perspective, but in some way offers a way of transition to free trade policy. The institutional and economic restrictions, that F. List considers for the success of protectionist policy, were analyzed. The reaction to the concept of educational protectionism was shown, both from the point of view of the role of this concept in economic policy in Russia, and from the point of view of a negative attitude towards this concept from socialist thought, including Rudolf Hilferding. It can be concluded that the concept of educational protectionism also turned out to be largely utopian, but it played an important role in expanding the boundaries of the discussion about free trade and the factors determining this trade policy.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. V. MakarovRussian Federation
Andrey V. Makarov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior Researcher, Senior Lecturer, Economic Theory Department
Moscow
V. V. Ostroumov
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Ostroumov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor at Economic Theory Department
Moscow
References
1. Kolesnikova T. V. Mekhanizmy realizatsii instrumentov protektsionizma v gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi politike. Dis. dokt. ekon. nauk: 5.2.6. [Mechanisms for implementing protectionism instruments in state economic policy. Dr. econ. sci. dis.: 5.2.6.]. Moscow, 2023, 426 p.
2. Gloveli G. D. The historicism and the historical current in Russian political economy. Istoriko- ekonomicheskie issledovaniya=Journal of Economic History & History of Economics, 2014, vol.15, no.3, pp.468-512 (in Russian).
3. Gloveli G. D., Spaderova A. A. Peripetics of “Tutelary Protectionism”. VTE=Issues of Economic Theory, 2019, no.2, pp.62-81 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24411/2587-7666-2019-10205.
4. Avtonomov V., Elizaveta B. Friedrich List in Russia. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost=Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2019, no.2, pp.145-159 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S086904990004147-3.
5. Tsedilin L. I. The industrial policy according to Friedrich List. Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk=The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, no.6, pp.102-110 (in Russian).
6. Popov G. G. National economic development in globalization environment: Friedrich List vs classical school. Jekonomicheskij vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, vol.5, no.4, pp.71-85 (in Russian).
7. Country comparison tool. The Culture Factor Group. Available at: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries (accessed 11.01.2024).
8. Zhong Y., Inglehart R. F. China as number one? The emerging values of a rising power. Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan Press, 2024, 239 р. DOI: 10.3998/mpub.12529012
9. List F. Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoi ekonomii [National system of political economy]. Moscow, Sotsium Publ., 2020, 722 p.
10. Kotsiris L. E. An antitrust case in Ancient Greek law. International Lawyer, 1988, vol.22, no.2, pp.451-457.
11. Shmoller G. Nauka o narodnom khozyaistve. Ee predmet i metod [The Science of National Economy. Its subject and method]. Litres. Available at: https://www.litres.ru/book/gustav-shmoller/nauka-o-narodnom-hozyaystve-ee-predmet-i-metod-546825/ (accessed 11.01.2024).
12. Heilbroner R. Filosofy ot mira sego [The worldly philosophers]. Moscow, KoLibri Publ., 2008, 432 p.
13. Vitte C. Yu. Natsional’naya ekonomiya i Fridrikh List [National economy and Friedrich List]. Litres. Available at: https://www.litres.ru/book/sergey-ulevich-vitte/nacionalnaya-ekonomiya-i-fridrih-list-22779177/chitat-onlayn/ (accessed 11.01.2024).
14. Shumpeter I. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza: v 3 t. [History of economic analysis: in 3 vol.]. St. Petersburg, Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2004, 1670 p.
15. Marx K., Engel’s F. O knige Fridrikha Lista «Natsional’naya sistema politicheskoi ekonomii» [About the book by Friedrich List “The National System of Political Economy”]. Moscow, Politizdat Publ.,1974, vol.42, pp.228-258.
16. Gilferding R. Finansovyi kapital: Noveishaya faza v razvitii kapitalizma [Financial capital: The newest phase in the development of capitalism]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo Publ., 1922, 460 p.
17. Lenin V. Imperializm kak vysshaya stadiya kapitalizma [Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism]. Litres. Available at: https://www.litres.ru/book/vladimir-lenin/imperializm-kak-vysshaya-stadiya-kapitalizma-63623922/chitat-onlayn/ (accessed 11.01.2024).
18. Angell N. Velikoe zabluzhdenie: Etyud ob otnoshenii voennoi moshchi natsii k ikh ekonomicheskomu i sotsial’nomu progressu [The great illusion: A study of the relation of military power in nations to their economic and social advantage]. Moscow, Sotsium Publ., 2009, 500 p.
19. Luxemburg R. Nakoplenie kapitala [The accumulation of capital]. Moscow, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1934, 463 p.
Review
For citations:
Makarov A.V., Ostroumov V.V. Concept Development of Educational Protectionism in the History of Economic Thought. Journal of Modern Competition. 2024;18(2):118-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2024-18-2-118-133