The use of HR technologies by business owners in ensuring the growth of labor productivity

The Russian economy is characterized by a relatively low level of labor productivity, 2-3 times inferior to the economies of a number of industrially developed countries. In the presence of well-developed macroeconomic labor productivity estimates in the Russian economy can be noted the limited number of micro-economic studies that have comprehensively examined the factors affecting productivity in companies. The issues of ensuring the growth of labor productivity have become especially relevant for Russian business owners in recent years. This is due on the one hand the sanctions pressure on the Russian economy, on the other hand, the pandemic COVID-19. Active implementation of HR-technologies in the practice of domestic business is just one of the reserves to ensure productivity growth. The purpose of the study is to identify ways to increase labor productivity indicators through the development and implementation of modern HR technologies in Russian companies. The research methodology consists in the analysis of literary sources on the problems of labor productivity and the effectiveness of modern HR technologies in solving this issue, as well as the analysis of scientific definitions within the framework of the research topic. This article indicates that labor productivity is one of the key factors in the competitiveness of the national economy. The influence of such modern HR technologies as technologies of personnel motivation based on KPI, technologies of talent management and technologies of continuous development were shown. The study identified ways to increase labor productivity through the development and implementation of advanced HR-technologies.

1. Алавердов А. Р., Алавердова Т. П. Противодействие неформальному сопротивлению со стороны сотрудников организации в процессе актуализации ее кадровой стратегии // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2020. № 3. С. 77-87.

2. Баранова И. П. Образование в эпоху HumanAge. Аналитический обзор рекрутинга в России // Кадровый менеджмент. 2013. № 1. С. 51.

3. Ветлужских Е. Стратегическая карта, системный подход и KPI: Инструменты для руководителей. - М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс, 2008. - 204 с.

4. Громова Н. В. Геймификация как инструмент обеспечении конкурентоспособности современных компаний // Современная конкуренция. 2018. Т. 12. № 2 (68) - 3 (69). С. 18-29.

5. Громова Н. В. Талант менеджмент как инновационная технология в системе HR-менеджмента современной организации // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 2019. № 9. С. 65-76.

6. Громова Н. В. Человеческий капитал как фактор социально-экономического развития России // Вестник Волжского университета имени В. Н. Татищева. 2019. Т. 2. № 1 (43). С. 14-22.

7. Жихарева Е. Д. KPI как фактор повышения эффективности менеджмента компании // Экономика и менеджмент инновационных технологий. 2013. № 3 (18). С. 22-24.

8. Vasiliev A. Entrepreneurial education quality management to improve university competitiveness // Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 2020. No. 23 (1). URL: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Entrepreneurial- education-quality-management-to-1528-2651-23-1-523.pdf (дата обращения: 13.04.2021).

9. Fourastie J. Le Grand Espoir du XX-e siecle. Рaris, 1963. - 384 р.

10. Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System // Harvard Business Review. 2007. Vol. 85. No. 7. URL: https://hbr.org/2007/07/using-the-balanced-scorecard-as-a-strategic- management-system (дата обращения: 13.04.2021).

11. Kendrick John W. Expanding imputed values in the national income and product accounts // The Review of Income and Wealth 25. 1979. Vol. 25. No. 4. P. 349-363. DOI: 10.1111/J.1475-4991.1979.TB00112.X.

12. Pozina M. B. Contemporary strategies of managing the process of learning // Astra Salvensis. 2018. Special issue. P. 691-700.

13. Riggs James L., Felix Glenn H. Productivity by Objectives. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall, 1983. - 260 р.

14. Rubin Yu., Lednev M., Mozhzhukhin D. Competition Studies: Structuring Competencies in University Entrepreneurship Programs // Higher Education in Russia. 2019. Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 21-33. DOI: 10.31992/0869- 3617-2019-28-1-21-33.