ANALYSIS OF THE COMPETITION ON THE COMMODITIES MARKET: THE FAS MODERN APPROAC
EDN: IAOPYD
Abstract
Commodities market situation analysis is the base for the decision making process in the anti-monopoly legal regulation development. The FAS issued Order No. 108 On the Commodities Market Situation Evaluation and Analysis Procedure on 25 April 2006. The Order came into effect in August 2006. There are some totally new points in the new Order. The main of them is the following. The so-called hypothetic monopolist identification test is introduced into the Russian practical law execution sphere. Among other innovations it is necessary to draw attention to the introduction of the market boundaries identification system; a new version of the subordinated businesses supervision system; and a new regional commodities market identification system.
References
1. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, U. S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, 1992. (Revised: April 8, 1997.)
2. Non-Horizontal Merger Guidelines, U. S. Department of Justice, 1984. (Originally issued as part of «U. S. Department of Justice Merger Guidelines, June 14, 1984.)
3. Commission Notice on the definition of the relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law. (Official Journal C 372 of 09.12.1997.)
4. The internal market and the relevant geographical market. The impact of the completion of the Single Market Programme on the definition of the geographical market / European Commission DG Enterprise // Economics. Copenhagen, 2003, 03 February. Р. 9, 61.
5. Алешин Д. А. Новые подходы ФАС России к анализу состояния конкурентной среды на товарных рынках. Перспективы практического применения «теста гипотетического монополиста» // Законы России: опыт, анализ, практика. 2007, № 6.
6. Бутыркин А. Я. Вертикальная интеграция и вертикальные ограничения в промышленности // Едиториал УРСС. 2003; и др. Статья поступила в редакцию 15.08.2007
Review
For citations:
Aleshin D., Polozhikhina M. ANALYSIS OF THE COMPETITION ON THE COMMODITIES MARKET: THE FAS MODERN APPROAC. Journal of Modern Competition. 2007;(5):25-38. EDN: IAOPYD
Email this article 