<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">moco</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Современная конкуренция / Journal of Modern Competition</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Journal of Modern Competition</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1993-7598</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2687-0657</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Московский университет «Синергия»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">QDECHM</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">moco-603</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>КОНКУРЕНТНАЯ СРЕДА: ГРАНИЦЫ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОГО АГЕНТА (ТРАНСАКЦИОННЫЙ АСПЕКТ ПРОБЛЕМЫ)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT: BOUNDARIES OF ECONOMIC AGENT(TRANSACTIONAL ASPECT OF THE PROBLEM)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кузьмин</surname><given-names>Е.А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kuzmin</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">KuzminEA@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Уральский государственный экономический университет</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Urals State University of Economics, Ekaterinburg</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>13</day><month>08</month><year>2025</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>127</fpage><lpage>141</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кузьмин Е., 2025</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2025</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кузьмин Е.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kuzmin E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/603">https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/603</self-uri><abstract><p>Статье акцентируется внимание на проблеме отождествления границ экономических агентов. Несмотря на видимую простоту, решение вопроса наталкивается на ряд существенных трудностей взаимоувязки концепций определения границ с институциональной теорией. Имеющие место методологические противоречия заключаются в строгости существующего подхода, когда границы есть нечто, возникающее либо под воздействием внутренних, либо внешних импульсов. В разрешение вопроса предлагается интеграционная модель, основанная на соотношении трансакционных затрат. В работе обобщаются и систематизируются теоретические представления о природе образования границ экономических агентов. Показывается важность свойства проницаемости границ на мик- ро- и макроуровнях: в переконструировании характеристик хозяйствующих субъектов и установлении вязкости экономической среды (силы трения.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Behavior of economic agents in the market is largely due to the desire to maximize the result of income which arises from the interaction with other actors. Impulse maximization sometimes appears in the form of extensive expansion - to increase the physical boundaries of the firm, raising its influence in the market. However, this is not always justified. Control may arise in intensive penetration by creating dependencies between counterparties. It seems that the key to understanding these processes should serve as transaction costs. Their role falls creating sustainable relationships, and seems to be exactly in their ability to form a specific ratio to engage in a dominant position in a slightly different form than traditionally seen. Building on this hypothesis article focuses on the existence of the problem of identifying the boundaries of economic agents. The apparent ease of solution of the problem faces a number of significant challenges linkages between the concepts of determining the boundaries of the institutional theory. Taking place in the methodological rigor of the contradictions is the current approach, where the boundary is something that occurs under the influence of either internal or external shocks. In resolving the issue by the author proposed integration model based on the ratio of transaction costs. The paper summarized and systematized presentation on the nature of the formation boundaries of economic agents. We show the importance of the permeability properties of the boundaries on the micro- and macrolevels in redesigning performance businesses and determining the viscosity of the economic environment (friction).</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>трансакционные издержки</kwd><kwd>границы экономического агента</kwd><kwd>вязкость среды</kwd><kwd>сила трения в эконо- мическом пространстве</kwd><kwd>вистрибутивность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>transaction costs</kwd><kwd>boundaries of the entity</kwd><kwd>viscosity of the medium</kwd><kwd>friction force in the economic area</kwd><kwd>vistributiving</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Авдашева С. Б., Дементьев В. Е., Паппэ Я. Ш.,Балюкевич В. П., Горбачев А. В. Анализ роли интегрированных структур на российских товарных рынках (доклад). М.: Бюро экономического анализа, 2000</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Авдашева С. Б., Дементьев В. Е., Паппэ Я. Ш.,Балюкевич В. П., Горбачев А. В. Анализ роли интегрированных структур на российских товарных рынках (доклад). М.: Бюро экономического анализа, 2000</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коваленко А. И. Конкуренция между вузами: институциональная дискриминация//Современная конкуренция. 2010. № 2 (20). С. 90-106</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Коваленко А. И. Конкуренция между вузами: институциональная дискриминация//Современная конкуренция. 2010. № 2 (20). С. 90-106</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузьмин Е. А. Проекционность экономического механизма в процессах преобразования неопределенности в объективный риск//Известия высших учебных заведений. Социология. Экономика. Политика. 2013. № 2. С. 78-83</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кузьмин Е. А. Проекционность экономического механизма в процессах преобразования неопределенности в объективный риск//Известия высших учебных заведений. Социология. Экономика. Политика. 2013. № 2. С. 78-83</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Матвиенко Д. Ю. Формы интеграционных объединений компаний//Современная конкуренция.2012. № 6 (36). С. 9-16</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Матвиенко Д. Ю. Формы интеграционных объединений компаний//Современная конкуренция.2012. № 6 (36). С. 9-16</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мартынова О. В. Группа лиц как самостоятельный субъект злоупотребления доминирующим положением//Современная конкуренция. 2013.№ 5 (41). С. 18-23</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мартынова О. В. Группа лиц как самостоятельный субъект злоупотребления доминирующим положением//Современная конкуренция. 2013.№ 5 (41). С. 18-23</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рейман Л. Д. Теория и практика функционирования инфокоммуникационных рынков. М.: ОЛМА-ПРЕСС, 2002. С. 34</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Рейман Л. Д. Теория и практика функционирования инфокоммуникационных рынков. М.: ОЛМА-ПРЕСС, 2002. С. 34</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Робертс Дж. Современная фирма: структура организации для достижения эффективности и роста: пер. с англ. М.: И. Д. Вильямс, 2007. С. 124</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Робертс Дж. Современная фирма: структура организации для достижения эффективности и роста: пер. с англ. М.: И. Д. Вильямс, 2007. С. 124</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рубин Ю. Б. Дискуссионные вопросы современной теории конкуренции//Современная конкуренция. 2010. № 3 (21). С. 38-67</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Рубин Ю. Б. Дискуссионные вопросы современной теории конкуренции//Современная конкуренция. 2010. № 3 (21). С. 38-67</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Осипенко О. В. Анализ «теневых» форм корпоративного контроля в контексте исследования методов недобросовестной конкуренции на российском рынке капитала//Современная конкуренция. 2012. № 6 (36). С. 46-56</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Осипенко О. В. Анализ «теневых» форм корпоративного контроля в контексте исследования методов недобросовестной конкуренции на российском рынке капитала//Современная конкуренция. 2012. № 6 (36). С. 46-56</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шевяков А., Клейнер Г. Социально-экономический мониторинг: концепция, проблемы, перспективы//Экономика и математические методы. 1993. том 29, вып. 1. С. 5-14</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шевяков А., Клейнер Г. Социально-экономический мониторинг: концепция, проблемы, перспективы//Экономика и математические методы. 1993. том 29, вып. 1. С. 5-14</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis//Marketing Science. 1985. № 4 (3). P. 234-254</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: a transaction cost analysis//Marketing Science. 1985. № 4 (3). P. 234-254</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Araujo L., Dubois A., Gadde L. E. The Multiple Boundaries of the Firm//Journal of Management Studies. 2003. № 40 (5). P. 1255-1277</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Araujo L., Dubois A., Gadde L. E. The Multiple Boundaries of the Firm//Journal of Management Studies. 2003. № 40 (5). P. 1255-1277</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barney J. В. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage//Journal of Management. 1991.№ 17 (1). P. 99-120</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barney J. В. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage//Journal of Management. 1991.№ 17 (1). P. 99-120</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boot A. W. A., Milbourn T. T., Thakor A. V. Boundaries of the firm: a theory of informational uncertaintyand learning. University of Chicago: working paper,2000</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boot A. W. A., Milbourn T. T., Thakor A. V. Boundaries of the firm: a theory of informational uncertaintyand learning. University of Chicago: working paper,2000</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Casson M. The economics of international business. Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar, 2000. Р. 118</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Casson M. The economics of international business. Cheltenham. UK: Edward Elgar, 2000. Р. 118</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Casson M., Wadeson N. Communication costs and the boundaries of the firm//International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1998. № 5 (1). P. 5-27</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Casson M., Wadeson N. Communication costs and the boundaries of the firm//International Journal of the Economics of Business. 1998. № 5 (1). P. 5-27</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cheung S. N. S. The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource//Journal of Law and Economics. 1970. 13 (1). P. 49-70</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cheung S. N. S. The Structure of a Contract and the Theory of a Non-Exclusive Resource//Journal of Law and Economics. 1970. 13 (1). P. 49-70</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coase R. The New Institutional Economics//American Economic Review. 1998. 88 (2). P. 72-74</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coase R. The New Institutional Economics//American Economic Review. 1998. 88 (2). P. 72-74</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Demsetz H. Toward a Theory of Property Rights//American Economic Review. 1967. 57 (2). P. 347-359</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Demsetz H. Toward a Theory of Property Rights//American Economic Review. 1967. 57 (2). P. 347-359</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dietrich M. Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Toward a New Economics of the Firm. Routledge, 1994. Р. 76</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dietrich M. Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Toward a New Economics of the Firm. Routledge, 1994. Р. 76</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foreman P., Whetten D. A. Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations//Organization Science. 2002. № 13 (6). P. 618-635</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foreman P., Whetten D. A. Members' identification with multiple-identity organizations//Organization Science. 2002. № 13 (6). P. 618-635</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gerlach M. L. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. University of California Press, 1992. Р. 70</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gerlach M. L. Alliance Capitalism: The Social Organization of Japanese Business. University of California Press, 1992. Р. 70</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jwa S.-H. The Evolution of Large Corporations in Korea: A New Institutional Economics Perspective of the Chaebol. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002. Р. 179</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jwa S.-H. The Evolution of Large Corporations in Korea: A New Institutional Economics Perspective of the Chaebol. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2002. Р. 179</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation//Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter. 1993. № 24 (4). P. 625-646</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation//Journal of International Business Studies, Fourth Quarter. 1993. № 24 (4). P. 625-646</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Langlois R. N. Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets//Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Syntesis/Edd. C. A. Montgomery. Springer, 1995</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Langlois R. N. Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets//Resource-based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Syntesis/Edd. C. A. Montgomery. Springer, 1995</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCarthy K. J., Fiolet M., Dolfsma W. The Nature of the New Firm: Beyond the Boundaries of Organisations and Institutions. Edward Elgar Publishing,2011. Р. 6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCarthy K. J., Fiolet M., Dolfsma W. The Nature of the New Firm: Beyond the Boundaries of Organisations and Institutions. Edward Elgar Publishing,2011. Р. 6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nonaka I. Product development and innovation//Japanese companies/ed. by Ken'ichi I., Ryutaro K. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1989. P. 253-271</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nonaka I. Product development and innovation//Japanese companies/ed. by Ken'ichi I., Ryutaro K. Tokyo: Tokyo University Press, 1989. P. 253-271</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">North D. C. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development//The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development/J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C. M. Lewis ed., 1995. P. 17-26</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">North D. C. The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development//The New Institutional Economics and Third World Development/J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C. M. Lewis ed., 1995. P. 17-26</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Okada Y. Competitive-Cum-Cooperative Interfirm Relations and Dynamics in Japanese Semiconductor Industry: Japanese Semiconductor Industry in Its Golden Age (1977-1992). Springer, 2000. Р. 19</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Okada Y. Competitive-Cum-Cooperative Interfirm Relations and Dynamics in Japanese Semiconductor Industry: Japanese Semiconductor Industry in Its Golden Age (1977-1992). Springer, 2000. Р. 19</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Salancik G. R., Pfeffer J. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1978</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schweisfurth T. Embedded Lead Users Inside the Firm: How Innovative User Employees Contribute to the Corporate Product Innovation Process. Springer, 2012</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schweisfurth T. Embedded Lead Users Inside the Firm: How Innovative User Employees Contribute to the Corporate Product Innovation Process. Springer, 2012</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teece D. J., Rumelt R. P., Dosi G., Winter S. G. Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence//Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1994. № 23. P. 1-30</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teece D. J., Rumelt R. P., Dosi G., Winter S. G. Understanding Corporate Coherence: Theory and Evidence//Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1994. № 23. P. 1-30</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wallis J. J., North D. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970//Long-term Factors in American Economic Growth/S. L. Engerman and R. E. Gallman, eds. University of Chicago Press, 1986. Р. 100</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wallis J. J., North D. Measuring the Transaction Sector in the American Economy, 1870-1970//Long-term Factors in American Economic Growth/S. L. Engerman and R. E. Gallman, eds. University of Chicago Press, 1986. Р. 100</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wernerfelt В. A resource-based view of the firm//Strategic Management Journal. 1984. № 5 (2). P. 171-180</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wernerfelt В. A resource-based view of the firm//Strategic Management Journal. 1984. № 5 (2). P. 171-180</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Whetten D. A. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity//Journal of Management Inquiry. 2006. № 15 (3). P. 219-234</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Whetten D. A. Albert and Whetten revisited: Strengthening the concept of organizational identity//Journal of Management Inquiry. 2006. № 15 (3). P. 219-234</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williamson O. E. Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations//American Economic Review. 1973. № 63 (2). P. 316-325</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson O. E. Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations//American Economic Review. 1973. № 63 (2). P. 316-325</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach//American Journal of Sociology. 1981. № 87 (3). Р. 563</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach//American Journal of Sociology. 1981. № 87 (3). Р. 563</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williamson O. E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead//Journal of Economic Literature. 2000. 38 (3). P. 595-613</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williamson O. E. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead//Journal of Economic Literature. 2000. 38 (3). P. 595-613</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zajac E. J., Olsen C. P. From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of inter organizational strategies//Journal of Management Studies. 1993. № 30 (1). P. 131-145</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zajac E. J., Olsen C. P. From transaction cost to transactional value analysis: Implications for the study of inter organizational strategies//Journal of Management Studies. 1993. № 30 (1). P. 131-145</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zimmermann K. F. Frontiers in Economics. Springer, 2002. Р. 450</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zimmermann K. F. Frontiers in Economics. Springer, 2002. Р. 450</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Santos F. M., Eisenhardt К. М. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization//Organization Science. 2005. № 16 (5). P. 491-508</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Santos F. M., Eisenhardt К. М. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization//Organization Science. 2005. № 16 (5). P. 491-508</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
