mocoСовременная конкуренция / Journal of Modern CompetitionJournal of Modern Competition1993-75982687-0657Московский университет «Синергия»IMPLQRmoco-164Research ArticleСтатьиСУБФЕДЕРАЛЬНАЯ БЮДЖЕТНАЯ ПОЛИТИКА В РОССИИ: ПОЧЕМУ НАБЛЮДАЕТСЯ ДИВЕРГЕНЦИЯRUSSIAN SUB-FEDERAL BUDGET POLICIES: WHY DO WE OBSERVE THE DIVERGENCE HERE?КоломакЕ.А.KolomakЕ.Институт экономики и организации промышленного производства СО РАНInstitute for Economics and Mass Goods Production, Siberian Division, Russian Academy of Sciences200813082025033543Copyright © Коломак Е., 20252025Коломак Е.Kolomak Е.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.moderncompetition.ru/jour/article/view/164

Сохранение и развитие динамики роста требует сбалансированности развития и усиления интегрированности внутреннего экономического пространства страны, что невозможно в условиях сохранения высоких различий между территориями. В связи с этим сближение фискальных региональных параметров является одним из существенных факторов снижения межрегиональных диспропорций и сбалансированности макроэкономического развития в стране. В текущую политическую повестку выдвинуты вопросы стратегического планирования. Выработка концепции регионального развития должна опираться на глубокий и объективный анализ результатов предыдущих политических решений. В статье представляется исследование последствий усиления вертикального направления в бюджетной политике в России.

It is necessary to keep the balance in different regions' economic development and integrate the territories into the single national economic policy implemented within the Russian territory in order to maintain the sustainable development trend. It is impossible to fulfill the task unless the interregional economic development gap is bridged. The harmonization of the different regions' taxation and financial profiles is one of the key factors that could bridge the interregional economic development gap and establish a balance in the national macroeconomic development. The strategic planning issues are on the currently operating policy-makers' agenda. The regional development concept should be based on the deep objective analysis of the consequences the policy makers' decisions used to lead to. The article author presents the findings of the research into the growing 'vertical orientation' trend the Russian national budget policy has got now.

ReferencesAnnala С.N. 2003. Have state and local fiscal policies become more alike? Evidence of beta convergence among fiscal policy variables. Public Finance Review 31 (2): 144-165.Annala С.N. 2003. Have state and local fiscal policies become more alike? Evidence of beta convergence among fiscal policy variables. Public Finance Review 31 (2): 144-165.Anselin L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Anselin L. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Barro R.J. and X. Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth, MIT Press.Barro R.J. and X. Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth, MIT Press.Carlino G. and L. Mills. 1996. Convergence and the U.S. states: A time-series analysis. Journal of Regional Science 36 (4): 597-616.Carlino G. and L. Mills. 1996. Convergence and the U.S. states: A time-series analysis. Journal of Regional Science 36 (4): 597-616.Conley T.G. and E. Ligon. 2002. Economic distance and cross-country spillovers. Journal of Economic Growth 7 (2): 157-187.Conley T.G. and E. Ligon. 2002. Economic distance and cross-country spillovers. Journal of Economic Growth 7 (2): 157-187.Coughlin C., T.A. Garrett, and R. Hernandez-Murillo. 2007. Spatial dependence in models of state fiscal policy convergence. Public Finance Review 35 (3): 361-384.Coughlin C., T.A. Garrett, and R. Hernandez-Murillo. 2007. Spatial dependence in models of state fiscal policy convergence. Public Finance Review 35 (3): 361-384.DeJuan J. and M. Tomljanovich. 2005. Income convergence across Canadian provinces in the 20th century: Almost but not quite there. The Annals of Regional Science 39 (3): 567-592.DeJuan J. and M. Tomljanovich. 2005. Income convergence across Canadian provinces in the 20th century: Almost but not quite there. The Annals of Regional Science 39 (3): 567-592.Fingleton B. 2003. European Regional Growth, Springer, Berlin.Fingleton B. 2003. European Regional Growth, Springer, Berlin.Hoover K.D. and S.J. Perez. 2004. Truth and robustness in cross-country growth regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (5): 765-798.Hoover K.D. and S.J. Perez. 2004. Truth and robustness in cross-country growth regressions. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 (5): 765-798.Le Gallo, J. 2004. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review 27 (2): 138-163.Le Gallo, J. 2004. Space-time analysis of GDP disparities among European regions: A Markov chains approach. International Regional Science Review 27 (2): 138-163.Miller J. and I. Gene. 2005. Alternative regional specifications and convergence of U.S. regional growth rates. The Annals of Regional Science 39 (2): 241-252.Miller J. and I. Gene. 2005. Alternative regional specifications and convergence of U.S. regional growth rates. The Annals of Regional Science 39 (2): 241-252.Moreno R. and B.Trehan. 1997. Location and the growth of nations. Journal of Economic Growth 2 (4): 399-418.Moreno R. and B.Trehan. 1997. Location and the growth of nations. Journal of Economic Growth 2 (4): 399-418.Pritchett L. 1997. Divergence, big time. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3): 3-17.Pritchett L. 1997. Divergence, big time. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3): 3-17.Rey S.J. and B.D. Montouri. 1999. U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies 33 (2): 143-156.Rey S.J. and B.D. Montouri. 1999. U.S. regional income convergence: A spatial econometric perspective. Regional Studies 33 (2): 143-156.Scully G.W. 1991. The convergence of fiscal regimes and the decline of the Tiebout effect. Public Choice 72(1): 51-59.Scully G.W. 1991. The convergence of fiscal regimes and the decline of the Tiebout effect. Public Choice 72(1): 51-59.Sala-i-Martin X.1996. Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review 401325-1352.Sala-i-Martin X.1996. Regional cohesion: Evidence and theories of regional growth and convergence. European Economic Review 401325-1352.Sala-i-Martin X.1996. The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal 106, 1019-1036.Sala-i-Martin X.1996. The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal 106, 1019-1036.Webber D.J., P. White, and D.O. Allen. 2005. Income convergence across U. S. states: An analysis using measures of concordance and discordance. Journal of Regional Science 45 (3): 565-589.Webber D.J., P. White, and D.O. Allen. 2005. Income convergence across U. S. states: An analysis using measures of concordance and discordance. Journal of Regional Science 45 (3): 565-589.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.